The EU debate - Part III

Thanks for your synopsis.

Despite your assertion, I'm not left wing at all, you turnip.

Hence the reason I've said on here that Corbyn is completely unelectable, but don't let little things like facts get in the way of your latest display of your complete idiocy

 

It's cute that you try to imitate my argument, but like 'bigot', it seems strawman is something else you don't know the meaning of.

You just seem to throw random words and claims at the screen, instead of having any sort of coherent, structured argument.

No wonder you get so angry and abusive.

 

Tobes the....

 

I've got plenty of points, but they would be wasted upon you, the snide and the sweaty old fart who is hooked up to a saggy munter in spain.

As Hull & Peter have demonstrated countless times, you are incapable of intelligent debate and so entrenched in your dogma that I am content to sit back and watch you make complete idiots of yourselves.

So, just carry on entertaining me until I say stop. There's a good lad

 

Ahhh pictures now, how sweet.

Go play with your crayons sat in the corner, there's a good lad.

 

Go on then you fletching troll, enlighten us with some of your fantastic wisdom

 

Oh dear, the strawman is about to get torched.

This morning you replied to my post;

We're talking about racial abuse, do you think it is wrong?

With this;

Are you saying abuse is okay, as long as it's not racial? That sounds like you discriminating on racial grounds to me honky.

http://www.not606.com/threads/the-eu-debate-part-iii.335684/page-512

I'd not made any comment about any form of abuse barring the subject matter i.e. racial abuse.

That post was therefore you putting words in my mouth and thus trying to create a strawman argument, as I'd said nothing of the sort.

You then re-iterated the same bullshit and called me a hypocrite despite me not posting a word on the subject you'd moved on to.

So much so Pete replied to one of your strawman posts with this;

Does that mean he supports abusing people on religious, gender, sexual orientation or disability grounds?

You created a completely false premise and ran with it, now you've been torched

please log in to view this image

 

... not wanting to appear pedantic ... but Trolls would probably find the making of good quality arrows beyond them due to a lack of finger dexterity

 

Have some dignity worzel ffs.

You just look desperate, and it's embarrassing for you.

You're a screeching ****er most of the time, but every now and then you seem to post something worth reading.

You've ****ed up this time though. Deal with it.

 

No, as I don't need to 'deal' with anything Sarge

As you created a completely false argument based on nothing but your own assumptions, hence the reason you can't counter that post with anything other than a faux victory dance

 

In your mind, I'm sure you can delude yourself there's some truth in that. Meanwhile, in the real world, you look a tit and an abuser.

My position hasn't changed from the off. I stated it several times. You and stuttering have wriggled and diverted, only to come back to the self and same position as me.

Your whole position is a diversion, as you've had to admit that the overall problem isn't brexit related, but has been rising for years (something you initially called a load of ****), and therefore is not n the topic of this thread. I don't mind discussing it, but it IS a diversion and not raised by me.

You've made a bundle of bullshit claims about my views and motives along the way as a strawman diversion.

That's what you have to deal with.

 

I look a tit and an abuser eh...

Well I never.

Wouldn't that comment be you dishing abuse like?

You ****ing idiot

 

We weren't talking about your position.

We were talking about you making completely false assertions about my supposed views, despite me not even passing comment.

Diversion you say? You're a ****ing past master at it, as you've just yet again proven.

 

Nice bit of diversion from you and stuttering.

It saves you having to face the reality that you're now agreeing with my initial position. You both seem lacking in solutions, but as you clearly agree it wasn't brexit that made racism, it's probably best for another thread.

 

Poor spin Worzel. No doubt stuttering will like it though.

Instead of all these diversions of yours, how about you get back to discussing brexit?

 

Keep up Pete. At no time has Tobes said he supports abuse. As the topic under discussion was racial abuse he has said that he does not support it. You obviously like to abuse people that you think, usually incorrectly, are less intelligent or educated so should I come to the conclusion you support all abuse.

 

please log in to view this image

 

Jeez! What a ****er!...

 

If you really believe that, you're even thicker than I first thought!..