The EU debate - Part III

So the answer is no. You do not have a picture of the first wave of child refugees, you have a picture of one man and no idea as to whether he was accepted as a child on reaching the UK.

 

He is one of the child refugees that came in late last week

 

Let me just remind you of what you said.

There is clearly one person the papers have picked up on, we also know that the home office have confirmed he is not being treated as a child since arriving on the UK and is believed to be aged 38.

This does not support your claim that the first wave all looked way over 25.

 

no, but it was in the Sun so it must be true, why would Murdoch lie????

 

Thanks, I don't think English is his first language.

 

another

 

the one at the back looks like a turkish guy I went to school with, everyone was jealous of him as he had a beard and 'tache at 14, he used to put our bets on at the bookies.

 

Another what?

That's a picture of a bloke in a hoodie, link the article that backs up what you stated was fact, you trumpet.

 

He's some random mini cab driver who friended you on facebook.

 

when a dentist performs an inspection they record their results
they will then provide an opinion based on the records
you act like they provide an age in isolation
what's invasive about having a dental checkup? dont you go to the dentist?

 

It looks like the loony lefties want to spend taxpayers money on adults who should apply for asylum when they arrive at the first safe country

 

There is likely to be the odd over 18 who slips through the system but those shown on this thread could easily be under 18. Plenty of 17-year-olds look older. It's hardly a phenomenon exclusive to the Middle East.

 

I dont think he does, having an xray is not invasive at all

 

But it seems to be more than the odd one, which is a pity as we all dont mind the kids coming here, but the adults can go **** right off.

 

http://www.express.co.uk/pictures/g...-on-October-17-2016-in-Croydon-England-175470

It was always going to be the Express, wasn't it?

 

and what does it show, Men or Children?

Why have the home office put of covers so any new "kids" cant be seen, why would they need to do that

 

And the loony righties want to waste our dentists' time and our money in inspecting the teeth of young people just so we don't take more than our 'fair share' of young adult refugees. Don't you find it embarrassing that a country of our wealth has to resort to this crap.

 

Because children are vulnerable and shouldn't have to have their pictures plastered all over the place?

 

X-rays are a potentially damaging procedure which can only be justified if there is a medical advantage.

 

how much do you think a dental inspection and age opinion will cost compared to paying for everything for the men until they are "25"? then a few years later they will be demanding a state pension.
you dont seem to understand anything about money