The EU debate - Part III

I'm more pointing out how ridiculous you and the others look than defending him.

The diversion's nothing to do with me, look at the earlier replies.

 

Absolute bullshit, yet again..

It's patently obvious that you attempt to defend him. You've done it so many times before.

Now, why is that, I wonder? Possibly because you support and share his bigoted views??..

He's not only an odious bigot, but a world class hypocrite, liar and self deluded moron!..

 

http://www.politico.eu/article/eu-set-for-dirty-brexit-theresa-may-european-council/

Give and take

Michel Barnier, the former French foreign minister appointed to head the exit negotiations on behalf of the European Commission, has made clear on his first visits to national capitals that the talks will cover only a narrow four-point agenda of separation issues and, by implication, not the broader question of the future EU-U.K. relationship.

Barnier had said his mandate would cover, first, what he called “the check” — the amount Britain will have to pay to cover its share of continuing EU program payments and other liabilities such as EU staff pensions; second, the status and rights of EU nationals in Britain and British nationals in the EU; third, the administrative disengagement, including the future of EU agencies based in Britain; and fourth, “special situations” such as arrangements for Northern Ireland and Gibraltar.

Conspicuously absent from that list are issues which the British see as central to their interests such as access to the EU’s single market and so-called passporting rights for U.K.-based banks and financial services firms, as well as any transition arrangements before tariffs would apply

 

Cute strawman bigot.

I'm sure people looking in will be really impressed by the strength and style of your argument.

 

Far more than your non existent one, I assure you

 

It's sad and amusing that you probably convince yourself that there's some truth in your claim that you think abuse can 'win' an argument.
I think even nursery kids would realise just how superficial and inaccurate that really is.

It seems more that you hope it makes people go away, which doesn't seem to look like a position of strength, so excuse me if I don't respect your 'assurances;.

 

Only sad and amusing to sad people, like you!...

It wasn't meant to be an argument, just a statement of unarguable facts.

 

QED

 

That's enough of your deflection bollocks for tonight, as I'm getting bored now...

Just to be clear, he's an obese, nasty, narrow minded bigot. Not to mention, A liar, a hypocrite, and self deluded beyond imagining.

If you want to continue to try and defend the indefensible, please carry on...

 

Pete claimed he had not been subject to abuse on other forums and asked PnP to provide evidence that he had been abused elsewhere, evidence which PnP was able to provide promptly, and in abundance. Whether the abuse Pete got on these forums was justified nor not is beside the point, Pete knowingly lied when making the claim that he has not been abused elsewhere. And I have no respect for people who lie

 

The simple fact of the matter is, that they're having something inflicted on them as a Nation that exists within a Union, that they overwhelmingly rejected.

The entire basis of your argument against the supposedly undemocratic Union of the EU. That fact isn't lost on them either, and they're far from 'OK with it' in my experience.

Which polls are you referring to btw?

 

Riiight, it's me deflecting? Have you read the replies to see who's initiating and who's responding?

You defend the right to post childish abuse, and think you have the high ground.

 

did you just make that up?
have you got any evidence that it was done knowingly?
it would appear that you are deliberately lying now

 

So you didn't know that you had received this abuse, even though you were fully aware of these posts in the other forums as you have replied to most of them.

 

But they're not having it inflicted on them, any more than those that didn't vote SNP are having that inflicted on them. They voted to remain in the UK. The UK voted out of the EU. That's just how democracy works.

If they have another referendum and vote to leave the UK, I'd respect their choice, even though in my opinion, it would be a mistake for them. (edit) I'd go as far as saying that if they voted out, I'd want the UK Government to make the transition as smoothly and painlessly as possible.

The polls were two yougov polls, one about a month after the EU referendum, and one in late August. I linked them earlier.

 

can't you think logically?
I had forgotten about them. It was a long time ago.

 

You lied, as you know fine well you've been called a **** on numerous forums since the inception of the Internet

The fact that you claim to forgotten the specific incidents brought to your attention, proves that they weren't exceptional occurrences in your internet history

In short, you've been owned

 

Doesn't change the fact that you've been shown to be a liar. You hate liars.

And salad.

 

Monday: Internet invented
Tuesday: Pete uses the Internet for the first time
Wednesday: the Internet calls Pete a ****

 

It's pointless trying to debate anything with Dull, mate. He gets his arse handed to him time and again, yet is still as boneheaded as they come.

Trying to defend Fat man after yet more revelations about his unsavoury history of being a complete **** on other forums, is just indicative of where his own political views and loyalties lie.

Not that he'd ever be brave enough to actually come out and admit his own bigotry.