Off Topic Vote - HIAG's best wum **** up

That's why he's done a runner, cue dopey bollocks.

 

please log in to view this image

 

Why can you still not speak about skiddy's comments directly piske ?

I've said I won't condemn HIAG as his comments are totally different to skiddy's. You can disagree with that but many other posters have said the same so I am not alone in my line of thinking on the issue and I genuinely would be pillorying HIAG if his comments had they been the same as Skiddy's. Again you can choose to disagree with that if you want.

You, on the other hand will not risk jeopardizing a meaningless chat site relationship in order to compromise a view you clearly do not hold strongly, if at all

 

You're just getting tiresome now. I've repeated myself endlessly about my position on this and you're still acting like a bitch.

You've said you won't condemn HIAG's comments, yet here you are trying to claim moral outrage because somebody who gives you short shrift has said something similar.

You're a hypocrite, simple.

 

They are not similar, not at all and I have explained why countless times

You claim to condemn comments mocking aspergers, in that case do you categorically 100% condemn skiddy's ?

Yes or no

 

please log in to view this image

 

...I think I must have missed your responses ...don't be shy ... I'll make this bit easy ...HIAG, ban or no ban? ... but do remember your credibility may be at stake ...

 

HIAG has made repeated slurs against children with Autism, made comments about 'special needs kids', 'Window lickers on the bus' etc and you're trying to tell me that it's not similar. You are full of **** mate.

You've shirked every 'yes or no' question put to you, so you can get ****ed if you think I'm going to play your games. I've made my position clear, if you don't understand it, then more the pity you.

#hypocrite

 

How different SIAB? He/ you made deplorably evil slurs about children with autism but you'll ignore those because you can't be seen to condemn yourself. Yet more than happy to make yourself look an utter Cnut with your faux outrage. If you condemn one you have to comdemn both.
So YES or NO?

 

Interesting.

Saintsfan has called for people mocking disabilities to be banned ?

Which account should be banned ? HIAG / Saints or both ?

 

please log in to view this image

 

Post my comments on here again and I'll rip you with them, now don't bottle it. DO IT!

 

Every post in my OP is a bona fide HIAG wum **** up

 

please log in to view this image

 

I don't think they are remotely similar, obviously you disagree but you're entitled to your opinion and I am entitled to mine. A similar common argument is the use of the N word directly towards a black person with nasty intent and whether it is as bad as simply saying the N word itself with no perceived malice to noone in particular or someone who isn't black. For me the former is 1000X worse than the latter as is the case here but again you are well within your rights to disagree

You have not made your position clear with regards skiddy and I've made mine clear with relation to HIAG.

You have a lot riding on this piskie. Do you condemn skiddy's comments to matt the other day yes or no ?

 

please log in to view this image

 

I don't have anything riding on this unfortunately for you,
because whilst I have made my position clear, you have well and truly shown yourself to be a hypocrite.

 

Do you condemn skiddy's comments, yes or no ?

You've not made yourself very clear on that score.

 

Why are you regurgitating the same posts? The first fact about a true and bona fire outrage is you have to judge with the same measure. You're claiming that your comments about children with autism are acceptable because they were written by your other account HIAB but mine are different because you don't like me for banning you from the Chelsea board.

Also Piskie banned you from the Arsenal board and there's a grudge there too. There are similarities in this and your not making yourself look good with this mental charade hence we come to the real reason for the two accounts. So man up here, you either condemn or don't condemn comments about children with autism. YES or NO?

 

You're just repeating the same thing over and over again, whilst ignoring what I've said and shirking every yes or no question that's put to you.

Do you think HIAG should be banned, as you claimed people should be for making comments that mock disabilities ?

YES OR NO ?

 

Just keep wriggling ... perhaps use one of HIAG's fishing captions? ...