The EU debate - Part III

the interesting thing is the loonies make statements but are totally unable to support their statements with even one example
it's like they dont understand the concept
but then again I've never thought they were very adept at conceptual thinking

 

The random warblings of a garage dwelling failure.

 

There were two links to the telegraph as I'd just posted the reply below showing how even Labour admit they ****ed up on immigration and others on here where trying to say all was rosy, before I did in deed **** up with the screen shot.

The Rees-Mogg thing was a remnant from when I posted the youtube clip before. I'd stuck it there before posting as I was doing something else. It's gone now after you reminded me.

I hope that puts your wee mind at rest.

 

He's a bloke old enough to remember a car ad that had a theme tune sung by Petula Clark

He's from an insular ****hole on the East Coast that has a very low non white population and a very high level of bigoted knuckle draggers

He's got a grey beard and makes watching paint dry seem interesting.

The bloke could put a glass eye to sleep and his facade is like tissue paper, as he's made patently clear with his performance this afternoon post the appearance of that racist ****ing moron Zlatan

 

But you don't use google to formulate your latest bullhsit argument

Welcome to the point

 

When that fails, they try to push their **** ups down the thread with playground abuse.

 

I didn't use it to formulate the argument, I used it to find articles that I knew existed (I've even posted them before) to show how the other argument others were offering was busted, so my argument was far, far from bullshit, unlike yours in this exchange. The fact they were posted at around the time of the ****, should have been a clue that didn't need much deducing.

In your world, do other people type the Bloomberg links from scratch, without going to the internet page?

Piss poor point.

 

Sure....like you don't have Rees Mogg on your toolbar and have never quoted the words of David ****ing Icke as your own

You're nothing but a bitter auld fart from Hull who hasn't got the courage of his convictions.

You make snide intimations about race, colour and creed and back up posters who are patently racist, and yet you continue with the pretence that you're not cut from the same cloth.

 

Except I DID have a link to a Rees-Mogg clip on the tool bar, as I've just said and explained, I've never quoted David Icke as far as I know. I think he's a bit of a pillock, but some of the pictures that google (yep, I used it) threw up that turned out to be from his site amused me.

You and others make claims you can't back up, and start screeching like a tart when you're called out on it, and as you're doing now, try to build more strawmen, and then claim I haven't the courage to back up what are in fact your invented convictions.

I was asking Bodanki what definition he was using for "****er". He could have just put "Tobes".

 

I dont think he understands what a definition is

 

He can't be ****ed to say the truth .

He said I called many people fascists with no reason then when I said that was not true as I had only called Le Pen a Fascist he said that I had also called Hitlers Nazi's Fascists so he was right and I was wrong.
So in his head calling Hitlers Nazi's Fascists is me using the word against them for no reason.
I listed the exchange and he did not respond yet has again come back with his distortion.
I gave him figures for deaths in world war 2 ( a war against fascism ) from an educational website that lists civilian and military deaths in WW2 which at the larger end comes to over 94m deaths yet he decides that Chinese deaths in world war 2 shouldn't count cos they'd have been at war with Japan anyway.

He accused me of "acting like Mao and Stalin didn't kill millions" which is odd because
A) I have never defended either of those murdering dictators
And
B) I had not referred to either of them.

He also asked me questions about Diane Abbott be Shadow Foreign Secretary even though I had previously made it clear I have nothing going positive to say about her.

I did say that over 100m had died due to fascism as I thought I had seen that figure for deaths in world war war 2 and the Holocaust. And when I gave a website with the figure 94 m he played it down imo.

He has also tried to take issue because I said that I was ignoring him but not using the ignore button...cos obviously I have to so what he says.

All this cos he objects to me calling Le Pen a Fascist when he thinks otherwise.

He moans that people use insults on here yet he constantly does the same.

Imo he is used to getting his own way and can not cope when he doesn't.

 

I gave a definition for that. Hypocritical, bigoted **** (or similar).

 

I don't think you understand what a lettuce is but I don't harp on about it do I you fat ****?

Does Ula have to periodically sponge down the bits buried under your folds of fat?

 

If it's a list of words you don't know the meaning of, I reckon it'll run to a few pages in itself.

 

Some of us are more than capable of conceptual thinking you deluded, bigoted, waste of oxygen

However, most of us don't like the posts of a racist bloke from Kiddie who's got the intelligence of a garden shed, together with liking the posts of some ****ed up white immigrant who hates Islam and the thought of the spread of non whites amongst the populous of the U.K.

We also don't work out of garage in South London, nor do we want to block immigrants from the EU despite being married to one, and having a HMO slum that we admit to housing them in. Given where you live I'd wager that a large proportion of your clients are also immigrants who are contributing to the GDP of this country and are no doubt employing people to boot.

You're a walking contradiction who thinks he's somehow vastly superior to people who have achieved way more than you in life - not that it matters, but it patently does to you, hence the reason it came up in the first place (before you slapped us all on ignore)

You're an odious piece of ****

 

Medium build

please log in to view this image

 

If I use the words "non whites", they will definitely confuse the **** out of you Dull

 

You quoted Icke's words as your own - before it was pointed out to you, and then you backtracked. Despite having already posted links to his words at that point

As you said on the Hull board, your memory is ****e, it must be your age love or maybe it's merely selective memory loss.....

I've made no claims I can't either back up with fact or make a structured argument that explains my conclusion

Like the thick bloke you are, you've labelled those opinions 'straw man arguments' when in fact they're conclusions based on the evidence provided - by you.

 

I said: “You seem to accuse many people of being fascists but you also seem incapable of justifying the label.”
http://www.not606.com/threads/the-eu-debate-part-iii.335684/page-396#post-9829692
You added the "with no reason" to what I said to make it mean something different.
You just lie to make out you are right.
You don't seem to understand there are TWO "Le Pen"'s because you say "Le Pen" as if there was only one. I think you are getting them mixed up.
Don't you realise you come across as rather stupid when I ask you to justify your assertion that Marine Le Pen is a fascist and your response is "find out for yourself". That is not a justification. It means you are unable to provide a justification.