The EU debate - Part III

this thread seems to be full of left wing loonies talking nonsense followed by sensible people explaining reality
this then makes the left wing loonies very upset
they must think reality has no place in their La La World

 

Are you ****ing serious.?? You sad deluded old ****wit!...

So, The Nazis weren't fascists??

Edit: And so are the Le Pens fascists, too!...

 

Still waiting ....Explain the reference to blacks in response to my post. I never mentioned blacks. That was either an assumption or a generalisation by you. Which was it?

Also, how did I **** up by using the term non whites to describe non white people?

 

Stan, it's no good asking the same question when it's been answered several times, it just makes you look dim.

 

There goes those voices in your head again Pete. Listen to the voice that's encouraging you to have a salad.

 

So you can't answer the first question and are trying to deflect. Understood but it doesn't change the fact that you consider all non whites to be blacks.

My second question hadn't been asked before but you chose to hide from that one as well.

Good work building your straw man Dull

As ever, see my sig

 

You build a strawman, and then claim I 'm building one? That just shows your ignorance on what it is.

As for not answering, I have answered it several times, and tried different ways of explaining it as you were clearly struggling.

I've never claimed all non-whites are black, as your failure to find a quote of me saying that proves.

 

Post a link to where you explained why you referred to blacks in answer to my post in which I didn't mention blacks.

Jump to it Dull

 

Have a read through, you have a choice of several which you either can't grasp or chose to ignore. Here's my latest attempt to explain why your question and argument is flawed. I've no more confidence you'll understand it any more than the others.


http://www.not606.com/threads/the-eu-debate-part-iii.335684/page-414#post-9836426

 

In no way does the post in your link answer the question of why you mentioned blacks in response to my post.

As a reminder.

Stanley: "No doubt the likes of Kustard, Pete and this Zlatan cockend think along similar lines ie that it's normal to dislike non whites."

Dull: "Where is he saying he dislikes blacks?"

 

If you can't see why you just look like you're wriggling for the sake of an argument, there is little hope.

In the context of the replies around it, the reply I've given and the later explanations show the 'assertion' you try to claim is false and based on your poor question.

You look far more like you're lying about what you meant, are an idiot that didn't understand the context or both.

 

It's a straightforward question that you've failed to answer.

I referred to "non whites" and you read that as "blacks".

Saying that I don't understand, am wriggling, lying, I'm an idiot etc doesn't explain why you referred to "blacks" in response to a comment about "non whites".

Why won't you answer the question?

 

that is the usual reality
these people do not let the truth hinder their comments

 

He wont.
He doesn't answer anything, he is a ****ing idiot.
His sole intention on here is just to talk **** and annoy people.

Every single time someone asks him a question he claims either a) It's a non question (whatever the **** that means), or B) That he has answered it in a previous post, when he didn't, and even if you had Dull, this forum has a quote function where you can post **** you have previously said, and PC's also have this awesome thing called copy and paste!

 

He won't, because he can't!

Not without exposing himself fully for what we all know him to be.!...

 

I haven't failed to answer it, you've just refused to accept the answer no matter how patiently I explain it.

It's about the different accepted uses of the same word. In the context, your claim you meant 'non-white' fits the key bodies definition of black and you're saying the same as me.

 

I have answered you thick tart.

I even posted references to the bodies tasked with looking after such things. and at least one link to the answer, plus further elaboration.

 

Aye up, it's my clueless stalker.

 

Exactly!...

I'll play his silly game with him until I get bored (and, Christ is he boring!) then just leave him to rant away at himself...

 

It's fun when he goes into these tailspins and its just a case of waiting for him to call "straw man" and somehow claim that whoever's taking the piss out of him is actually the real bigot.

I do have a degree of sympathy as I've been to Hull.