The EU debate - Part III

So you objected to me calling a Hitlers Nazi's Fascists?

When the **** should they be called then?
Misunderstood?
A bit naughty?
And you claim to be sensible?

 

http://orwell.ru/library/articles/As_I_Please/english/efasc

it is impossible to define Fascism satisfactorily without making admissions which neither the Fascists themselves, nor the Conservatives, nor Socialists of any colour, are willing to make. All one can do for the moment is to use the word with a certain amount of circumspection and not, as is usually done, degrade it to the level of a swearword.

 

I didnt object to you calling Hitler's Nazi's Fascists - where did you get that from. I said you called many people fascists but you denied it. Now you seem as if you are admitting it.
Let's get this straight: Have you only called Marine Le Pen a fascist? Yes or no? I submit that you called many more people fascists.
You seem to be trying to wriggle out of being wrong by wishing you had accused me of something else and not of what you did accuse me. Just to be clear
You said: "You ACCUSED me of calling MANY people fascists. I then asked how does calling Le Pen a Fascist equate to many people and you have just refused to answer." and "in your mind, I have called "many people " Fascist...so would you care to retract or explain?"
I explained. No retraction is needed.

 

hahahahaha, don't slag off the Nazi's lads

 

Go chuck yourself in a skip

I'm sure Ula would agree

 

looked out side and sky is white.

Better run back to your safe space quick

 

The sky is white every day in your world, Kustard.

 

Only when its cloudy, as it is now, no thanks to the remoaners

 

If I won the lottery I'd buy the house next door to yours and move a family of asylum seekers in.

 

That might just be the smog.

 

I can see quite clearly what their 'ideals' are thanks!..

Yes, by your own petard..again.,...

 

Just like you, Dull.

There's your massive hypocrisy come to the fore, yet again!...

 

I'll lump this nonsense together, You clutter the place up too much as it is.

You struggle to show an understanding of so many words and concepts, I doubt even you know what it is you're trying to claim.

Why not drop the ineffective and dull 'insults' and have a bash at the topic? It looks like you're afraid of doing that after making a fool of yourself so many times when you've tried.

Sadly, you still look a fool with your attempts at insults, possibly more so.

 

That's a contradiction worthy of the Mitcham bean counter

 

I can read, ****wit! I saw your post to Tobes and I can see what this foundation is up to.,..

Just like I know what you're up to!....

You're ducking and diving, yet again!

Why bother?? Everybody knows what you are. A far right, bigot!...

 

Any more ****ed up sterotypes coming from you?

 

I dint know why I waste my time on the ignorant little tosser.

He thinks he's so clever. He's as transparent as cheap tissue paper...

 

Oh dear. Tobes got burned with similar ****e earlier. Your argumentum ad populum doesn't make it any less bullshit.

 

I've got loads, I'm sure I can shoe horn a few more in.

No problem.

 

I don't know if I've mentioned this, but unlike you, I don't claim to be clever, I claim to be a bit dim.