The EU debate - Part III

Yet you've consistently failed to ever prove either claim.

 

You prove it for me.

Why waste your time, pal? Everybody here knows what you and your pal, Tubby, are!....

 

aaand STILL you can't prove either claim.

I'm starting to think your claims to having super intellect may have been a wee bit of an exaggeration.

 

TL;DR
That's the longest answer to the question, "do you think Pete is a ****er?", that you will ever see!

 

The only clowns here are you, your fat mate, and Kustard.

 

He won't answer, Bod. All this deflection bollocks is all too familiar 'tactics' from Dull.

 

And each time you or someone else asked the question (that has **** all to do with the topic anyway), I've mentioned the failure of some on here with defining words, so asked you to explain what you're meaning by '****er', but you keep on dragging this out and ignoring that.

 

I think your claim to even possess a brain, is a gross exaggeration!...

 

Apart from the several times I already have you thick twat.

It's a diversionary question from him anyway to detract from yet another of your **** ups.

 

It's those first two words that contradict so much...

 

The **** you have. You lying, snakey little ****..

 

Oh I have. It looks like 'answer' is another word you've had the wrong definition for.

 

No, really, I do think!

And, I think you're a complete ****.

 

Usual bollocks from Dull as Hull!...

 

Marvelous.

Anyway, now the pleasantries are over, perhaps you'd care to stop avoiding questions and finally back up these daft allegations of yours.

 

I think you have had him in your back pocket for long enough, let him out for the weekend.

 

They're not allegations. It's a fact.

There is a difference.

 

I can confirm from the pieces i've read, Pete is indeed a ****er

 

Like you, he couldn't find his back pocket. He'd have to find his own arse to do that.

Something he's totally incapable of...

 

There is, but like so much else, you seem to have it wrong.

An allegation is something that then needs to be supported by a fact or it's just some fool flapping his tongue in the wind. As yet, you've repeatedly failed to produce any facts to support your allegation.

Off you pop.