The EU debate - Part III

Yup, just call it any question you don't want to answer a non question.....sounds legit.

From now on, everything you type on this board will be classed as a "non sentence" and will be trusted as such

 

I see you're still not answering the questions I asked you on your subject. I guess that makes you evasive by your rules.

 

Sentiment is my middle name, your downturn is my winter coat.

 

Exactly.

 

Do you like chicken?

 

Is it nice weather today?

Define how you like the weather to be.

Well is it hot outside.

Well that really depends on what you classify as hot. Until I know this I can't possibly answer. Are you still beating your wife?

 

It doesn't burn, because it's made of tar and asphalt. Eat it if you want head worms.

 

I think he may be clinically ******ed.

 

See, farmers wouldn't always find hot weather 'nice'. You can do university courses on the failings and errors of value positions.

You can do them on logical fallacies too.

If I see one on ****ed up diversionary tactics, I'll post the link.

 

depends on what you classify as a link.

Do you still beat your bishop?

 

I doubt you can do entire courses on such narrow topics.

I just don't see the need for you to evade questions. The question "do you think Pete is a ****er?" only requires evaluating if you're intentionally trying to avoid answering it.

 

You're not a very nice person are you?

 

Absolute nonsense! But nothing new there. If you post childish nonsense, I pick you up on it, as do many others.

You don't like it, so you resort to being abusive and rude. That's always how it degenerates.

You're a hypocrite accusing others of doing exactly what you do yourself. But, absolutely nothing new there!

 

I thint the diversionary courses could be useful to you, particularly if it's linked to question setting and comprehension.

Fair play, the attempts at sarcasm seem to be deflecting from yours and nsis **** ups.

 

Only a complete bigot himself would attempt to defend Tubby's bigotry!

 

Depends on what you classify as **** up.

It's not diversionary because of the answers previously posted.

Do you still finger bang Jane?

 

So your favourite European cities just happen to be historic centres of fascism?

 

That wasn't the initial question. I questioned what was described as the proof of "exhibit A". I pointed out that there wasn't proof, which was admitted. All I've done is ask for elaboration on the questions, which so far all I've had is diversions and daft comments.

 

Your first two words some up the rest.

 

I'd say that your Exhibit A, is a decent example of a **** up.