The EU debate - Part III

To you, that's probably correct.

 

Yup, just me.

Biggest deflect job.

See whats just happened, is that you know the consensus amongst decent people on this site is that Pete is a total ****.
So your options are
A: To say you think he is a ****er, in which case you win points with the majority, but lose your friend and fellow **** sack Uncle Pete
B: Say you don't think he is a ****er (The truth) and expose yourself as a vile sack of ****, same as him
C: Just ramble in non sequitur bullshit to deflect the question in an attempt to abstain <----- This is the option you took.


I see right through it Dull............you're crystal mate.

 

Now I wait for you to say some **** about me stating that Pete is a ****er as fact, when its my opinion etc etc
and I have cornered you with a loaded questions blah blah..


No no, the fact that Pete is a **** is NOT in question, by anybody on this board who is worth the air they breathe........so don't even try it.

 

It's a bit dull when rather than answer a simple question you write a short essay to explain why you won't answer it.

As Bod has asked again, it's quite a simple question about Pete. Blustering over it and pretending it isn't doesn't make it less so.

 

I'd say the deflection is clearly all yours. After all, it's clearly you trying to divert attention from NSIS's bigoted **** witter, which was the topic at hand. <OK>

 

It was a weak diversion by him to help a struggling nsis.

Have you stopped beating your wife?

 

Not really, if you had just answered the question, this would have been over 15 posts ago and you and NSIS could have gone back to your to ing and fro ing.

 

That you have drawn out ridiculously.

 

I did answer the question. I gave my opinion on it, and your back pedal showed you agreed and understood.

 

I haven't. That's down to you trying to avoid the fact 'Exibit A' was baseless.

 

So you think Pete is a ****er?
or you don't think Pete is ****er?

Its not a multifaceted question mate, you either do or you don't?

 

Why not just answer his simple question? Most of these tit-for-tats between you and NSIS could be ended by you just answering the initial point rather than posting a dozen memes and seemingly intentionally drawing it out over several pages.

I'm not married

 

Which is an admission by you that your intial post was baseless nonsense.

Now, as I asked the other guy that asked that, given the multiple **** ups by some with definitions, what are you using as your definition of '****er'?

 

For the reasons previously mentioned. It will go on for pages if you keep ignoring the replies.

 

Speaking to this guy is like pulling teeth
He is like a character from the Matrix sequels. Uses a lot of time and words to say **** all.

You weird, weird man!

 

I'm not sure how that answers the question asked. It's just more of the nonsense that clutters the place up.

 

please log in to view this image

 

Agree, I've stopped bothering as I don't have time for all the evasive responses and partial denials.

Easier to just not respond so the discussion can continue than get hung up over it.

 

Asking for clarification and pointing out the stupidity of a non-question isn't evasive.

The diversion was the daft question in the first place as it had no real basis in fact and **** all to do with the topic at hand.

 

Finally one remaoaner with a bit of sense