The EU debate - Part III

Bullshit. As per usual!..

 

****wittery at its finest!

 

I do hope you summarising your post content like this is going to become a habit.

 

If I even began to point out the endless, pointless, unintelligent, unintelligible rubbish that you post, The number of time you've been pulled up over your stupidity, ignorance, bigotry, and xenophobia by not just me, but numerous other posters, it would take a week or more.

Then we're all treated to the usual spectacle of you desperately trying to deflect, divert, obfuscate, and finally post lots of idiotic memes in a desperate scrabble for the moral high ground. All done without ever once admitting that you might have got it completely wrong.

You're an idiot. Worse still, you're an idiot who thinks he's so clever and intellectual.

Truth is, your a halfwit!...

 

You live in fantasy land you ****wit.

I've repeatedly said I'm not clever, you just think you know what people think better than they themselves do, because you're an arrogant, pompous ****er.

I've posted picture, not memes (they're just something else you seem to not understand the definition of), and like this, it's you that obfuscates and diverts. Have a look at your last dozen or so replies to me for proof.

I'm the one that several times has held my hands up when I was wrong.

You've been asked before, and failed to produce any evidence of my alleged xenophobia or bigotry.

Have another go, or just continue to look like the bigoted lying fool you are as that load of ****e typifies the very low level of accuracy your usual posts contain.

 

Well you dont think Pete is one of the biggest ****ers in existence, so there is exhibit A.
Anyone who could, for even one second, empathise with that sorry twat isn't on the level.
Just saying

 

You state assumptions as fact...Just saying.

 

please log in to view this image

 

There has been lots of evidence. Your continued harassment of highbury Al, and then going on with a pointless rant trying to tell him things about the faith that he's followed all his life!..

You're a cretinous moron. That does not have even half the brain that you seem to think you possess.

You may try to deny your bigotry. You may try to deny the number of times you've been pulled up here by numerous posters over your pointless, idiotic posts, but everyone knows the truth!...

I repeat, you're a pointless halfwit who contributes nothing positive to this forum whatsoever!

 

I never harassed highburyal, nor posted a 'rant' telling him or anyone else about their faith, and you've posted zero evidence ever to support your allegations. Those are just the desperate rants of a deluded fool in the desperate hope some of them are believed, and divert attention away from his own bigoted ****wittery.

Instead of making desperate appeals of help from others, back your bullshit up yourself. I've asked several times now for you to prove these allegations of xenophobia or bigotry, you've repeatedly failed to do so.

You've started several 'exchanges' with me recently, solely to post childish abuse. That clutters this board up far more than the on topic posts that you're desperately trying to avoid.

 

Do you disagree with Bod's post?

 

There is nothing to support the claims he makes in it.

 

And you wonder why people call you evasive.

Pretending for a minute there is nothing to support them, it's still a quite simple yes or no question.

 

Where did I say I wondered why people call me evasive?

You're doing the same as him, and making claims I simply haven't made, and then expecting me to answer them as though I have.

That's not being evasive, it's simply pointing out the stupidity and strawman nature of a posters position.

In that respect, it's not a yes or no answer, because it's an invalid question.

If I asked you "have you stopped beating your wife" is that a simple question with a yes or no answer?

 

There is nothing to support my claim that Pete is an odious ****er?!?

Case closed.
NSIS wins!

 

The word "Bigot" should be banned from this thread.We're all happier calling each other ****s

 

There's nothing to support your "Exhibit A" whether I think that or not, which was your claim.

 

So do you think Pete is a ****er?
That IS a simple yes or no question.
Trying to compare it to the wife beating bollocks is stupid.

 

It's far from stupid, which is why you've now had to back pedal and change your position and actually try to determine some facts before claiming something as evidence. Your initial position was clearly bollocks. If I was NSIS, I'd be asking for a change of defence counsel.

Given the failings of others when using words they've wrongly defined, what are you saying is your definition of a ****er?

 

That post, literally makes no ****ing sense.
Thats just a bunch of words lumped together in no particular order.