Let's find Kirung a job

Baring in mind that Si is normally pished oot his gord on cheap polish lager whenever he meets up wea the hobo i fear his opinion on the Ukrainian skank can't really be trusted. Even her very existence is up for debate
 
Baring in mind that Si is normally pished oot his gord on cheap polish lager whenever he meets up wea the hobo i fear his opinion on the Ukrainian skank can't really be trusted. Even her very existence is up for debate

Plus SI is camera happy, I'm sure if he'd actually met him we'd have seen a photo of Toby on a train drinking lager.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mind The Duck
Oh right I see it must be kosher then.

:eek:
That's how corroboration works .
Person A says " I have a cowboy hat "
Person B (this is you) says " No you haven't "
Person C then interjects "Yes he does he was wearing it last night at the rodeo".

Person B should then use this testimony to decide person A does in fact own a cowboy hat.
If necessary photographic evidence of the accused wearing said stetson could be produced at a later date if person D uploaded their CV listing their previous and current jobs .
 
  • Like
Reactions: Toby
In summary Toby has offered to get Ciaran a job in IT but only if he can see his CV first. Ciaran is understandably none to keen to hand over his CV to a complete stranger so we have reached an impasse.

:huh:

Can you honestly not read?
 
That's how corroboration works .
Person A says " I have a cowboy hat "
Person B (this is you) says " No you haven't "
Person C then interjects "Yes he does he was wearing it last night at the rodeo".

Person B should then use this testimony to decide person A does in fact own a cowboy hat.
If necessary photographic evidence of the accused wearing said stetson could be produced at a later date if person D uploaded their CV listing their previous and current jobs .

Not in Scotland. We have a proper legal system whereby you need more than one person to corroborate your pish.
 
That's how corroboration works .
Person A says " I have a cowboy hat "
Person B (this is you) says " No you haven't "
Person C then interjects "Yes he does he was wearing it last night at the rodeo".

Person B should then use this testimony to decide person A does in fact own a cowboy hat.
If necessary photographic evidence of the accused wearing said stetson could be produced at a later date if person D uploaded their CV listing their previous and current jobs .

If only this was a court of law eh?
 
Deary ****ing me <doh>

Where did I say I was getting Kirung a job in IT? As if someone as thick as him would ever get a job <doh>

I'm talking slurry farm temping or maybe trolley pusher? Something along those lines.