The EU debate - Part III

Why would it, we would still import people for such jobs, pointless post is pointless.

 

You see that's exactly why this debate makes me fume.

Isn't the real reason we've got a shortage of social housing the simple fact that we've been selling the ****ers off since the days of Thatcher and not rebuilding at a rate that even came close to replenishing what was sold, let alone took account of an increasing population (excluding migrants)?

But no the Mail says "it's the migrants fault" and the Tories snigger. A ****ing joke man

 

You probably missed the part about £1bn being attributed to EU migrants...

You can't keep throwing the word 'Tory' at everything you can't counter. Check the date as well, at that time the government was pro EU, why would they be okay with this 'research' being released?

Still waiting for you to answer my question.

 

If someone has a problem with all of a religion it's a safe assumption they're dim enough to be racist. Islam technically not fitting the definition of a race doesn't alter that.

 

Richard Dawkins says hi.

 

I'm a Scientology racist, apparently.

 

Thanks for answering my question. You shouldn't really assume, it takes a significant jump in logic to correlate the dislike of a religion with racism, there's plenty of atheists who don't like religion, do we assume they are all racists too? Or is it only if they dislike religions that aren't Western?

 

This is why @Tobes won't answer, he knows he's dug himself a deep hole.

 

So why didn't Labour sort it out in 1997 - 2010?

Labour the nasty party

 

You must have missed the part were I said massive assumptions had been made in that report

Try this one;


http://www.cream-migration.org/files/FiscalEJ.pdf#page=26

 

A deep hole? ****ing lol

A complete lightweight like you claiming that is beyond laughable.

Your hatred of Islam makes you Islamophobic, this is cultural racism, you thick racist horror

 

Import?

 

There are many reasons not to like religion per se. Singling out one which covers hundreds of millions of people across the world and deciding you dislike them all because of something they were born into is ******ed at best.

 

I'm sure it's just a coincidence that the Tories are backed by people who own property and so benefit from the shortage by increases in their wealth. Its more of a stretch but I think May is in favour of Grammar Schools to make it easier for middle class parents to keep their children in front of the others. But both of these policies are dressed up in terms of allowing poorer people to meet their aspirations which seems to do the trick at the ballot box.

 

So, just so I understand, a lot of you people voted to leave the EU because of mass migration of Non EU citizens to the UK?
Am I understanding this right?
You are citing schools and NHS being overburdened with non English speaking people as one of the reasons, Yes?

I voted leave because I don't like the bureaucracy of the EU, and I believe its ultimate aim to be sinister, a cleansing of cultures and patriotism that turns Europe into some samey, Generic, one size fits all, superstate, run by rich European Bureaucrats who are interested only in how much they can get for themselves.

 

Plenty of Labour MPs wirh Kids in Grammar/Private schools.
Most landlords are small time "landlords" and not your "classic" Tory voter.

 

I'm sure Labour MPs take advantage of the current law of the land to advance their kids' interests. Doesn't mean the law is right though.

 

Wrong.

Thats what you assume, like all the remaoners here.

I voted out the same reason as you, but also control of immigration. the UK is not beg enough to have 80M people living on it.

 

Nothing wrong with grammar schools, let the best be educated to a higher level.

 

Except the research shows that they don't even achieve that. It's too hard to find who the best are!