The EU debate - Part III

I started trying to explain where you were misrepresenting my post. You pompously told me what I really meant and kept on doing it. You can't really expect me to ha e a serious conversation with you about views I don't hold.

 

Absolutely. You and your buddies show how right I was.

 

That's not what happened. Sorry.
It's not just me, either. You've done it to everyone that replied to you today.

 

But sadly, the same can't be said for you.

 

When the Irish let him off the leash, God's Teenie Weenie Cock will be along to tell Dull that he's done a cracking job "owning" everyone by resorting to calling them ****s

 

You're still doing it.

 

Sure....

 

I didn't even address any of your arguments in that post, so how could I possibly be misrepresenting you?
Stop trying to derail everything and take it off on a tangent, please. Discuss the issue or stop.

 

If you didn't address any of my points in a reply to that post, isn't that YOU going off on a tangent?

 

That is true. I do not make Pete look like a University Challenge winner

 

No, it's my attempt to get you to stop doing exactly what you're doing now.
This will be my last reply to your avoidance. Discuss the topic or stop posting.

 

And that reply is not at all pompous. No way no siree.

I'd love to discuss the topic, you need to get on it first so I can reply though. You've failed to do that so far.

Why not have a go?

 

The first sign of a challenge to what you post, you'll start deflecting and posting scarecrows again

Rinse and repeat

 

That means very little without any sort of analysis behind it? Unemployment is still 4.9% I believe, historically low, so I guess they weren't taking all our jobs. The net EU figure from that data is 180k and there's no mention of how many are students, what parts of the country they've settled in or anything useful to determine whether or not they're swamping us and overloading the UK as you claim.

 

I've given him the analysis earlier, but he claims to have me on ignore so can't respond

The net figure when you remove the total number of students is 167k and 43% of the total immigrants were from the EU. So the net population increase excluding all students, that is accounted for by EU citizens in 71k

We're bursting at the seams though.......Nige said.

 

Over 300k more people coming in every year is a huge burden, they still need to be housed and need medical attention (when needed) as well as schools for children. Sorry thats the UK being swamped.

Plenty of inner city schools were huge chunks of kids dont speak English at all or very well, putting pressure on teachers and taking resources away from British kids.

Stop being so binkered.

 

What about everything else he said in his post? Is any of it wrong? Why not challenge him? Nah just post a laughing face instead, you still haven't answered my question from yesterday either.

 

Try reading my preceding posts you dumb ****

 

So does your data tell you how many of the 71k EU immigrants who aren't students, were given houses for free? Or how many of them just bought a house out of their own pockets.
If they are EU immigrants then they are not refugees without a pot to piss in, surely. A lot of them will be coming here to work. And other than shelters, I thought they weren't allowed allowed to claim housing benefits or the like for 4 years?
That figure would include like a French businessman who has moved to London for work to be near corporate headquarters.....Where are the figures that show that all or a large section of, that 71k are all just coming here to leech of our government and steal our affordable housing?