The EU debate - Part III

It's a comment in the Mail by Peter Hitchens who is barking mad. Have a look at his political history.

 

Total bollocks

Thought Hitchens was dead?

 

Nothing to do with bias. Many Tory MPs think the BBC should not have public funding. I'm perfectly happy for them to argue that strongly while continuing to watch the BBC. Similarly if a Labour MP thinks that having private schools discriminates towards people with money so should not be allowed then she should argue for the law to be changed but it should be perfectly fine to use the until it is. Hypocrisy is saying one thing and doing another not arguing for a law change while complying with the current law. I think the top rate of income tax should be 50p. Am I hypocritical for not writing a cheque for the extra?

 

Is your taxable income over £150,000?

 

His brother died a few years ago.

 

Here we go....!

 

What has that got to do with you?

 

Only brain dead

 

you said about writing a cheque for the extra
that means you are indicating you do
given the way you talk I would assume you had a low paying job
so I get the impression you are lying

 

wrong ... you put many of us on ignore because you don't like what we have to say ... MPs could do the same ..you would not be invited to join those on ignore so that option isn't possible...similar to the MPs you mention being invited to join the BBC ...they wouldn't be ...

 

You keep making them assumptions Pete, and you're constantly wrong.

 

He wrote about not writing a cheque. Comprehension problems?

 

"writing a cheque"

 

...in this country or when combined with income cunningly held overseas like David Cameron?

 

Your assumption is wrong as is your impression. You oddly post in such a way that enables people to find out a lot about you. From that I am certain that I am better educated, cleverer, and more highly paid than you. I'm doing my best to explain the way the world really ought to be at a level where you can understand but I'm obviously failing.

 

Exactly that. He's laid his life bare to the forum so we know his qualifications, his job and the type of house he has. Yet he still lectures like he's academically, professionally and financially superior

64 year old, clinically obese poly graduate working in a converted garage in a **** area of South London. Epic!

 

http://uk.finance.narkive.com/76VZTkvn/lloyds-tsb-can-they-do-anything-right

 

I particularly like the issue with 'Good Afternoon' at 11am. Good Morning is of course short for 'I hope you have a Good Morning'. Its actually quite logical to wish people a Good Afternoon late in the morning. Good Evening by the way

 

It's like he's on one of those game shows where the comedian contestants are given a random subject and have to tell jokes about it.

Pete's given a random subject and has to be a **** about it.

 

What on earth does this mean in this context?