The EU debate - Part III

aaand again.

 

It is not in London, however, and is only worth 3-4 Euros. Mind you that may be worth £3-4 million shortly.

 

And if Deal could go down with it, all the better!!

 

Pete has given up on analogies. He is now into blank verse

 

give up reading
you dont have the comprehension skills required

 

Agree with this.

Not everyone voted Leave because of immigration but it was undoubtedly the deciding factor. Even if it wasn't it has become the primary driver in May's Hard Brexit. She's even said that people voted to curb immigration, which they didn't, they voted for Brexit.

It seems though that the realities of putting immigration ahead of the economy are starting to hit home.

Brexit: Poll shows British people want Theresa May to choose good EU trade deal over immigration cuts

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/b...rade-deal-over-immigration-cuts-a3370246.html

Interesting to note that the old still think immigration should be the priority as the economy means less to them than to the young and they are more scared.

 

It's comprehension bingo time folks!

 

There is doubt it was a deciding factor for many, and even then it was 'changes' rather than cuts many people wanted.

 

As I said, not everyone voted Leave because of immigration.

But it was the deciding factor in the referendum result. Undoubtedly.

 

Prove it, and explain specifically which part of immigration was what you claim is the issue.

 

May has made it the priority for Brexit. Either it was the deciding factor or she's not listened to the people which would be undemocratic and Pete would be raging.

I didn't claim any specific part of immigration was the issue. That's you reading what you want to read into someone else's post which you are expert at Dull. Do you do that to try and engineer pages of debate just so you have someone to talk to?

 

I never said you'd claimed a specific part was the issue, I implied the exact opposite. It's why I asked, and you've failed, to clarify.

You've made claims to support a feeble point you can't back up and then tried to spin it. Your mimicry of certain others is coming along.

 

What do you think she has done wrong?
Is paying for education now a crime?
Its not hypocritical to argue for the law to be changed while taking advantage of the current law. If it were most Conservative MPs would be hypocritical for watching the BBC.

 

I think I was right! Try a chat line, they'll talk to anyone

 

where did I mention it was a crime?
it is hypocritical though
if she doesnt believe in something then she shouldn't use it
it's like arguing for drug taking to be made illegal but still taking drugs
your BBC comment is stupid. what is the point you are trying to make?

 

You probably do, which given you've just shown yourself to be blowing out of your arse, speaks volumes.

 

Or like preaching about family values whilst banging Edwina Currie.

 

I bet you're an absolute barrel of laughs in the pub.

 

you really struggle with basic logic
if you are trying to say that some MPs are saying the BBC is biased then the hypocrisy would be if they joined the BBC and took part in the biased broadcasting NOT watching the BBC!

 

PETER HITCHENS: The falling pound is NOTHING to do with your vote for freedom

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-3840202/PETER-HITCHENS-falling-pound-freedom.html


Views on this.