Banned

Thank you,Thank you, Thank you.

For those who dont know this is the Newcastle fan who all the bother was over yesterday, the one some felt I should have banned, the one who we do not want on our boards. I said from the outset that football is an emotive business and when Newcastle and Sunderland fans come together tempers can be fraid. I honestly see my role to be to try and calm things, moderate and find a peacful way out. To me deleting and banning is a last, not a first resort. If I ban all Newcastle fans and Newcastle ban all Sunderland fans we lose one of the best things about being a northeast footy fan. A rivalry and banter going back years.

Now we find this nasty Newcastle fan is like the rest of us, a football supporter who somtimes loses his temper but at the end of the day is OK.

 

Syd

Fair comment, I see he is free to post here - is Stan similarly able to post on theirs, or is Leazes leading their chant of "We hate Mackems"???

 

I think stan is still banned but that, in my opinion, is a problem for Newcastle not us.

 

Unfortunately lads the mod's on here have had no training for the role. They were voted in by other members of the forum.
Obviously some will be good. Some, like our mate "Tadger". Will be very very bad.
Why is he upset. Did he have detention again?
To be honest if you can't take it, don't give it. Ain't that rite Badger?

 

Scared that Syd the rottweiler is thinking of banning your trolling arse much?

please log in to view this image

 

Too true. The same bunch who complain about us are the first to swamp us. Their age on that board reflects when NUFC was founded - 1992.

Tadger still hasn't got the balls to explain himself (unlike our Syd)

 

I said last week making that kid a mod was a bad move, when you had the likes of AG, overseas, who have been around a lot longer.


The forum will be ****ed if theres no sideways banter.

 

Look I'm going to offer an olive branch here.
Whilst I can't say I agree with some of the articles being pulled, going on and continually asking for reasons why when it seems he's not online and then comparing it to the likes of the slave trade and holocaust is not the way to go.
Both sides know the banter is what made 606 what it was and will hopefully make not606 more of the same.
One of yours handed my arse to me the other day and I'll fully admit that , maybe on another day it might be me dishing it out (but we all know we've got to take it as well as give it)!
I'd say wait a bit, if you see when Leazes is online then post again asking him why or even private message him.
I'm baffled by the outright banning I must admit (I was out yesterday so didnt see what went on to know either way) but chances are he's not been a mod before and is still learning, once he gets used to it - I'm sure he'll be fine, if not there's always the reasonable site owner MalteseMick who you could speak to.

 

ToonSi Look I'm going to offer an olive branch here.

And I'm big enough to take it, so welcome to the SAFC not606 board. I defend free speech (within limits) and want to see banter between us, so here we have Syd who has made his views clear - maybe look to petition your mod for the same freedoms?

 

Thanks for the support lads. Much appreciated ! Love the craic on here. Well done to all of you

 

Toonsi it seem to me that your mod I shat next to a badger likes to give it out on here but does not like it reciprocated, he is already documented as hating makems in fact his words i hate loath and despise them, so how can you explain how there will be two way banter, i don't go on the Skunks board but they bombard us here if we retaliate they ban proved, so your modder is a school boy play to my rules or ill take my ball back.

 

Toonsi - Fair enough of you to offer the olive branch, but as above, rogers point seems valid at this time don't you think?

 

Toonsi I have just posted my first and probably last post on your board.

Even the Admin Mick called it bad craic.

I have had disagreements on here with my fellow supporters wanting to ban the unwashed from here.

I too enjoy the banter and your fellow skunk WUMs attempts. (Lets be totally honest their fail is beyond belief)

As our superior intellect will always win out, over the disadvantaged deluded Mugs I have no problem with you lot at all.


May I genuinely point out if your lot are going to hand it out!


You learn to ****ing take it!!

 

I would be very interested to hear Mr RAWhites views on this thread i now he love Skunks and gives their drivel a torrid time

 

In my opinion, I sit next to a badger is a pillock, and hasn't got the now how for the position of mod. The bottom line is that there are far better qualified lads out there who would do the job much better.

 

Agreed 100% Mr RAW think this guy is too inexperienced about life, has too many inbred prejudices, and will drag the boards down if i knew how to do it on here i would get a petition going against him, as we are in our infancy on here a nerd likes this could spoil the whole shebang if we don't nip it in the bud

 

Can't seem to get a bite out of them over there at the moment!

Are they learning?

Pavlovs dogs come to mind

 

yawn

 

Sorry for not replying sooner, had a little trouble with wor lass, turns out she does whinge more than you RokerLad

In all seriousness I think if there was collaboration between our two moderators & the admin it would get a lot of this out the way, it's also why I believe there should be another mod on our board - just to get some consistency going (one could keep the other in check & visa versa).
Also if anything at all a thread should be locked, not deleted if it seems to be getting out of hand. That way if popular opinion differs the moderator can back track and re-open it (obviously I doubt there's anyway of restoration once a thread has been deleted) and banning shouldn't be done for anything other than racist, homophobic & personally abusive posts/posters etc.
I'm saying this because the Steve Bruce shops in Harrods thread was pretty good crack and then it suddenly disappeared without warning, I was a bit disappointed myself!

I'm pretty sure Syd has said it better than me already to this sort of regard in his post & Leazes is still a young 'un (admittedly I'm not much older myself like), but he'll learn or he could end up having to relinquish his mod powers.
A few other mags have already said their piece and I guess it's going to be up to us to keep him right, I'll have a word with him myself to see if he can be a bit more laid back as he is a decent lad deep down.

I just want to point out that myself, if you can remember me from 606, have quite enjoyed flipping between both boards; both for banter and serious debate - I have no problem talking your club's matters without a negative bias (my Dad is a Mackem so I've had all the banter & debate all my life!) and I know many of you feel much the same about us and I'd like that to long continue, so hopefully we can get around these niggles that have happened in the first few weeks. I think probably one of the problems looking on both boards is that the Sunderland board seems to be made up of more older, more mature & dare I say wiser than our board, where I swear at times half our board can be full of kids! (I bet I get stick from both sides now for saying that!)


Wheww, that was some essay - well done for any of you who have got this far, have a as a reward!