Off Topic PROPOSAL FOR HIAG & PISKIE TO STOP RUINING EVERY THREAD

God you do talk some ****e.....

 

Wrong, I didn't claim that. I said that Norris' dismissal from Arsenal had nothing to do with Arsenal's promotion.

You're just flouncing now mate

 

It's almost like he's trying to outdo HIAG for bullshit.

BTW, where has HIAG disappeared to ?

 

I wonder how long they want to keep this going ?

I'm happy to keep kicking into touch for as long as you want

 

Surely the fact that Norris wasn't the manager at the time and wouldn't be privy to any of that information to make the claim!

How do you know he didn't make the claim because he was bitter with the club and wanted to get back at the club and made a false claim!

 

That makes no sense.
Why would Norris' dismissal have anything to do with Arsenal's promotion? Nobody claimed that, so why would you deny it?

Norris was never your manager. He was your owner.

 

Knighton, but the point stands. He wasn't the manager at the time so wouldn't have been privy to any of it. Also, he never even said that Norris 'bribed' other chairmen.

He was known to have a very bitter relationship with Norris though, probably exacerbated by Norris sacking him. Another reason why he might try and get back at him and make spurious claims (even though he didn't)

Oh and his autobiography has been shown to have many glaring factual inaccuracies, it being noted that his comments on Norris cannot be taken with any degree of authenticity.

 

I meant knighton

 

It wasn't, as I've said. The reason I mentioned it was because you seemed to be trying to compare Norris being dismissed by Arsenal as equating to Norris being guilty of bribing our way to promotion.

 

Me making a claim doesn't prevent Ostrich Boy from making another one, does it?

 

I meant knighton for godsake....i am on mobile and trail of thoughts was on tv and phone lolz

 

No, I was using it as evidence that he was utterly bent, which is clear to everyone.

Now answer the question, bottler.

 

Yes, all of the evidence points to one conclusion, but let's make up a conspiracy for another answer, instead. That's honest.

Maybe you'll answer the question that the ostrich won't?
Are Arsenal the only Premier League club that aren't there on playing merit?

 

Being found guilty of one crime doesn't mean he was guilty of anything else. Surely you're not proposing that it does ?

What question ? And please ask nicely

 

If you show me credible evidence i will answer so far havent seen any apart from claims of it from various people.

 

Arsenal are playing there on merit though. We've won the league 13 times, thereby demonstrating that we have earned our place in it. If we weren't promoted in 1919, then we would have been subsequently given our record in said league, thanks

 

We're going to need a whole tanker full of for this thread soon ....

 

Thanks for that, Skiddy.

 

You said that he was found guilty of two crimes, not one. That's just against Arsenal.
He also looked like a serial killer:

please log in to view this image

 

Blimey saints goesband hiag turns up lolz

 

Sorry, Skiddy, I didn't quite catch that... Tell us all, again, what HIAB stands for?