Albert, answer this please. You said WE are against Nev. Who are you with? And why against Nev? if you are good and part of a sub-team, it means Nev has lied and you've let him mislead everyone. Otherwise, you make no sense jnless yoj are evil.
I have given as clear an answer as I can. Any clearer would NOT help you, but it would help others. We don't want the treasure for ourselves. There is a very good reason that Chaos chose the 'IT BELONGS IN A MUSEUM' video. No point going round in circles though. For the lynch then the Kurgon would be ideal - if we can be sure who it is. I don't think it matters which ones of Ritchie, Sebb, Tobes or Beardsley get killed - as long as we take as many of them out as possible. If you have a strong hunch on who the Kurgon is among them then I would be happy to change my vote. However, I am 100% certain Ritchie is bad which is why I chose him.
Should be a spicey night then chaps, I'm off out for a run in a bit then for a Curry at a place with an India Ross Noble. I'll be on and off as and when tonight. VILLAGE
it was a collective 'we' that the lot of us seemed to be rounding on him... and he's one of only a couple of 100% confirmed goodies.
**** knows... do you actually think I read every page! In all seriousness it looked like some were trying to throw some suspicion on him. I think he's a VERY good judge of character in this game. I'd soooooo love to vote for him to swing but I just cannot bring myself to it....
I'm sticking with my original RITCHIE Gut feel is always a good thing. Unless you have a lot of gut to feel you fat **** and it takes you a week to feel it.
Its called chaos. You only ****ed it up for yourselves cos it sounds like you were ALWAYS going to screw us over tomorrow
Whenever it happened, it would always look like we were trying to screw you over, whether we were or not. That is why I would have preferred to trigger our task much later. But ask yourself this, you've organised plenty of games. If someone was to be given a secret agenda for their own good, would you announce in the rules that they would be doing that? Or would Chaos' wording make it more of a headfuck if our agenda was actually to help the team but look like we might be screwing them over? We had to trigger the agenda at some point or we would have been no help. By doing it today we have helped the mafia by muddying the waters when we already knew who the bad guys were. However, if we hadn't have done it then we would have had to use up items that are needed later. There is no point in surviving for the sake of it. There is also no point in needlessly dying and not being able to help out later on. We had been avoiding battles throughout the previous two days, but today the rules changed and prevented us from doing that. I suspect the rules changed because the good team were in a very very strong position once the bad guys had been identified. The rules only changed after my post naming who I thought the bad guys were - which I think looks like it was correct.
I think the kill jurgen, no bod, no jurgen deal is what makes me think... nah no way is penfold doing this and beardsley but if tobes wasn't really paying attention he could have selected these options. so my guess was tobes = kurgan but really i have no idea.
But if you were organising it, wouldn't you want to headfuk the player who always headfuks everyone (aka Nev), by headfuking his team into distrusting the him as a headfukker. It's inevitible that he then has to to explain he's not headfukking which in going so makes look like even more of a headfukker. It's a classic headfukker twist Chaos has given us.
