The EU debate - Part III

You don't know what they will do then, you only think you know

 

Oh, the old meltdown claim!

Got no response? Don't know when you're making a fool of yourself with your stupidity? Answer: - claim a meltdown!....

 

It would indeed be a great place for a decent, intelligent debate, if it weren't continually interrupted by your idiotic ramblings.

 

Nobody understands wtf you're on about, fatty. Apart from maybe Dull, he's about on your level!...

 

You made a bullshit assertion, I proved it was bollocks.

It's you that's refusing to take being caught out on the chin end.

As per.....

 

... cue Kustard

 

You seemingly don't understand the simple concept of democracy, which is ironic given that we were supposedly 'getting our country back' from the undemocratic EU.

Seemingly your happy to hand our countries future over to a couple of washed up right wingers, a floppy haired liar and an unelected PM, to do what they like with - without Parliamentary backing nor consultation. What a complete dong.

 

You proved only that you haven't a ****ing clue.

You do get a tad upset when you **** up and your twists and wriggles fail.

 

He says, with yet another in a long, long line of dull, idiotic ramblings.

Let it go, post on the topic or try another tack you tedious **** wit. Your 'insults' have zero impact.

 

Is that a small town ooop north ?

 

The Roman's knew it as Tedium. Tobes is well on the road to it.

 

Meanwhile at the Conservative Party

Theresa May dismisses Jeremy Corbyn's Brexit 'shambles' claim

Theresa May has rejected a claim by Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn that she is overseeing a "shambolic Tory Brexit".
During Prime Minister's Questions she said she wanted "maximum possible access" for the UK to the single market after leaving the European Union.
Mr Corbyn said the government had "no answers", but Mrs May promised to be "ambitious" in Brexit negotiations and to exert greater migration control.
MPs are now debating a Labour motion on Parliament's role in Brexit policy.
The party is calling for "proper scrutiny" by Parliament of discussions ahead of the government starting negotiations with the EU.
Brexit Secretary David Davis said: "The premise on which we are advancing is that we will have proper scrutiny. But it is not one where we will allow anyone to veto the decision of the British people."
The subject of Brexit dominated the first Prime Minister's Questions since the end of the party conference season, with Mr Corbyn asking: "Is the prime minister really willing to risk a catastrophic Tory Brexit just to appease the people behind her (Conservative backbench MPs)?"

 

Why? I'm on the right one here.

You're an utter waste of space. You constantly disrupt this thread with your ignorance and stupidity. You have neither the wit nor the intellect to discuss the issues of Brexit, so you resort to your oh so familiar tactics of diversion, deflection, and obfuscation.

If you find a decent sized brain somewhere, come back then, eh.?

 

Or Stan

 

If you check trigger, this 'exchange' was initiated by you in response to my much demanded explanation of an earlier post. Mine were brexit related, yours were you usual mindless diversionary bleats.

It's rather dull to say the least. If you're determined to avoid the thread topic, can you at least pep up your 'abuse'.

 

Pompous Pete's Blueprint For The UK's EU Exit Negotiations

 

Absolute rubbish!...as per usual!....

 

Come on, set me a challenge. The reply to that writes itself.

 

I proved that you told a whopper

 

The Referendum was not legally binding and therefore it did not result in a 'decision'. What we have discovered is that a majority of people wanted to leave and that was based on the information given to them during the campaign. It would be wholly democratic, once we have negotiated the exit, for the same question to be asked again. If David Davis thought he wanted a decision he should have argued for the referendum to be binding before the event. Of course he didn't because he expected to lose.