The EU debate - Part III

UK nationals employment rate at highest in 20 years. I thought they were taking our jobs?

please log in to view this image

 

Sorry this you?

 

Spooky resemblance to my avatar.

 

That looks like Pete.

 

Not Pete, unless you are him?

 

That's you that is...

Are you about 12?

 

Seriously, it's like a younger, happier Pete. I have no idea how you failed to notice.

please log in to view this image

please log in to view this image

UKIP NEEDS YOU!

They've even got the same haircut, just Pete's has gone grey.

 

I'm know that you're an infantile twat!

 

He's an intelligent man, you thick as pigshit far ****.

 

I have ever been owned by 2 kitchens. He does not have the mental abilities to own any of us.

 

Owned seems to be the wrong term, given some claim all property is theft. It's probably better to say he borrows you for a bit, and pops you back when he's finished.

 

Explain yourself...... If you've not got enough money,couldn't you take on another tea round?

 

It's probably better to say that he posts like an Express headline spambot and can't handle any form of dissection of his simplistic outpourings

No wonder you get on well with him

 

He quotes a French anarchist to try and make himself seem intellectual.

 

I'm very comfortable, thanks wetty

I expected that kind of a response from you as it was all about you. No thought given whatsoever to what a ****e pound means for the country. Old bigots like you only give a **** about themselves. It's what makes you such an objectionable ****. Same as Pete, God's Cock and Kustard (at least Pete can string a sentence together).

 

He's not capable of that either. Everything he says is wrong or so vague that he can claim that our powers of comprehension are not sufficient when we call him on it. He dismisses anybody who disagrees with him and seems strangely unaware, for an accountant, of what will happen to the economy within a few years. I feel sorry for his clients.

 

Not really, Proudhon's for those that couldn't grasp Marx when they first read (or like you, googled) it.

 

Just to clarify, in pikey speak you "own" someone if you put them on ignore?

So when a kid puts their hands over their ears and says "na na na I can't hear you!" they are in fact "owning" whoever they are ignoring?

Good work Pete, your band of merry men think you're a ****ing superstar!

 

À

 

I see, you voted remain so must be right, sorry tea boy, 52% said no, we want out. Better get the brew on, you boss wants his tea and he is not happy with you.