The EU debate - Part III

This whole idea of the £190m per week suddenly being spent on UK business and infrastructure is bullshit anyway. Here in Cornwall we used to get around £60m a year in EU funding to pay for Business support, road and bus travel, highways improvements, building university campus'. The Tory govt have already said that from 2018 Cornwall council will have to find that money themselves, this is a council who are shutting libraries and toilets because they are so skint.

 

Push a few immigrants in the sea and it'll be fine.

 

giving UK workers Jobs, win win

 

Is that one of the Sensible Party's policies ?

 

Of course not. There are no policies.

 

And costing the UK economy millions more in admin each year to do the same job which was being done for us.

 

That'll reflect the Brexit plan perfectly then

 

We've got a great plan. It's all just a secret.

 

Why would you want to do that?

What a twat you are, I bet you want all the so called "Darkies" drowned first?

 

Think about it.

Why pay the EU money when you can spend some of the money and keep UK works in jobs paying tax and buying goods?

Your logic is strange

 

The irony of your post is that you are exactly the sort of person who would call someone a darkie because you're scared of anyone who isn't pasty and thick.

 

Or a pig ****er because he hates their religion.

 

Not wumming, can you elaborate on this? Are you talking year on year costs, or the initial "set up" costs?
Cheers.

 

Big news just leaked:

THERESA MAY TO ANNOUNCE ALL EU LAW TO BE ENSHRINED IN BRITISH LAW BY SPECIAL
ACT OF PARLIAMENT AND ONLY GRADUALLY REVIEWED AND REPEALED AFTER BREXIT

In other words, leaving the EU would not lead to a single EU law or regulation being abolished and the plan would be to abolish unnecessary laws and regulations over subsequent years.

 

You haven't thought this through. It makes no sense to pay to duplicate where work is already being done, so in essence all you are doing is paying more to have the same work done. The money to pay for it will come from UK taxpayers, so even if those workers pay into the exchequer, it's offset by the cost of employing them in the first place.

 

The set up costs aren't part of what we pay in, they would be additional.
The year on year costs are real and our spending on these will have some benefit UK workers but things like the EU drug administration which are based in the UK would be moved to another EU country.

 

Pete will be seething when he reads this.

 

In a lot of cases we already do that, as we have to comply with both UK and EU rules. I do appreciate in the short term it could cost us more, but this work to our favour in the longer term.

 

That's hilarious. Morons like Kustard will be strutting around muttering "we won" when absolutely **** all will have changed (other than the damage done to the GBP and the future economy). The supporters of the far right have been completely duped!

 

Possibly. It all depends on how efficient brexit is. Personally I see it being a lumbering dinosaur of an operation that is going to take years to disentwine ourselves from. Ultimately I think it's going to be very expensive for UK taxpayers in terms of sheer admin work. But yes longer term it would create jobs that otherwise wouldn't exist.