Should he stay or should he go: the JFH Poll thread

At Ellers' request a poll to see what we think of JFH's future, specifically in response to the Telegraph story, not as a comment on his capabilities or otherwise as a manager.

So sorry Wubba, you cannot vote on both incompetence and morality on this occasion.

Personally I am for a quick cull.

 

Let the club decide - guess who voted for that?

 

Don't have to guess, it's an open Poll, the votes are public.

 

We don't have all the facts on this. We should wait on the results of the Club's ongoing enquiry. At least.

 

I don't like the sound of an eternal inquiry. I've got stuff to do.

 

I'm not sure about 'nothing wrong' but I suspect not enough to be sacked or walk. Option 2 is the sensible vote I suppose but I decided to go for 3 anyway!

 

I find this faith in the capability of anyone at the club to conduct an inquiry (or make an enquiry) rather touching, based on the competence they have shown running a small organisation.

Get Judge Lionel Nutmeg and the Wheel of Justice on the case.

 

I want him gone on the basis he is a **** football manager, if these allegations speed up that process all the better.

 

Haha, well spotted! An eternal inquiry is some form of endless purgatory, surely?

I'm afraid that the pedant in me stops me from being able to vote for that one until the typo is fixed.

 

I am vehemently opposed to so called 'sting' operations so on that basis I am out

 

An eternal enquiry suggests we're waiting forever for info. Like being on the phone to the QPR box office

 

Wasn't a typo, neither was the misuse of enquiry. Other than that I think the questions are fairly worded, which was a struggle.

 

You wrote the options. Change them to until we know the facts then. Or until your Judges wake up.

 

Fair enough. Same difference though, still can't bring myself to vote for an eternal enquiry. Be nice if it reached a conclusion of some sort.

 

I reckon get rid and replace with Big Sam

 

I don't need any more facts, he is on film asking for money from a 3rd party and creating a clear conflict of interest for himself. It might not be legally wrong, he may have been unaware or ignorant of the position he was putting himself in, but not acceptable.

This isn't Hillsborough or Bloody Sunday, let's get on with it and spin the wheel of justice!

 

I'll edit it to help you make up your mind.

Oops I can't. Just imagine it says what you want it to say. And then vote out!

 

Ta very much

 

Ah well, Jimmy can be happy at least you're not his boss.

 

Careful what you wish for even in jest!!