Off Topic Sensible party policy suggestions (sensible ones please)

The board rules you signed up to for one.

You agree to not use the Service to submit or link to any Content which is defamatory, abusive, hateful, threatening, spam or spam-like, likely to offend, contains adult or objectionable content, contains personal information of others, risks copyright infringement, encourages unlawful activity, or otherwise violates any laws.

 

You've been criticising people on here using the address on Pete Saxons company website for the past few pages, and also the information found with his political party info.

This is exactly the same as what I pointed out.

 

Now he just looks like a complete idiot!

 

Go have a gander at the GC board and come back to me

 

Yes and political personalities information isn't private. Neither is links to company information that the poster has posted himself.

My God, it's a simple concept!!!!

 

A Sensible party does not have infighting like the Trog Labour party.

 

There seems to be a fair amount of weak, feeble justification for cowardice.

 

How do you know that the only two members - Pete and his wife - don't fight?

 

Nothing new there!...

As I said this morning, his sanctimony by proxy is as hypocritical as it comes. If two kitchens has any objections, let him speak for himself.

 

It doesn't matter if Pete complains or not. I said from the off he most likely doesn't give a ****.

That's not the point. The cowardly hypocrisy of a few on here is shameful.

 

As has already been patiently explained to you, if we had chosen to do as Pete did and reveal our indentities, and then expected different treatment, then yes, we'd be guilty of hypocrisy.

As we did not, we are not, and as usual, you're full of sanctimonious ****.

All clear now?....

 

It's like banging your head against a very thick wall isn't it?

I mean how obstinate do you have to be to think that information someone has publicly disseminated is private?

 

Marvellous, so if someone used bits and bobs from your posts that show who you are, you'd have no objections to a similar line of posting?

To be fair, I'd end up standing up and saying that was wrong too, even though you would squeal like a stuck pig.

Above any of that, it's against the board rules you signed up to, no matter what other cowardly, hypocritical justification you attempt.

 

He knows he's pissing in the wind here.

But he thinks he's achieved his objective, which was to try and occupy the moral high ground when the hypocrisy of his cry arsing about 'abuse' was pointed out to him.

 

Mate, they don't come any more pig headed than dull.

He's now resorting to his end game tactics. Keep repeating the same baseless **** or accusations, bore your opponents into submission, and then claim 'victory'.

It's about as predictable as night following day!....

 

Oh do **** off you unbelievably tedious ****! Do you really think we're all as thick as you?

The only hypocrisy here is yours - in spades!....

 

As above. There are plenty of bits and bobs posters post on here, including personal details for a variety of reasons. In your world, they're all fair game for abuse.

Part of the problem is, this selective acceptance gives approval to others to dig and post personal information. It's happening on another thread right now.

Abuse and banter is fair game, but there's a line, and bringing too much personal stuff into it crosses it in my book.

Some of you seem to struggle with the difference between personal and private.

 

I'll answer these together, as they're pretty much the same diversionary ****e.

Bollocks.

 

Entirely pedictable!

 

So tell me 'Oh High and Mighty Hullsome' how is it that Peter Saxon wants his information to remain private by... running for public office by starting a political office, posting said information, including his name, into the public domain on his website, on article(s), and on this and other forums?

How exactly is that similar to someone who wants to remain private by not posting their name, address, own photo on this forum while posting under an alias?