Off Topic Sensible party policy suggestions (sensible ones please)

I'm interested. Can you find it?

 

Probably, but I'm not going to look.
We're both well aware that you made it, which you've made abundantly clear with your failure to deny it.
Why do you want to read your own post?

 

Okay, as it seems to be how this bit of the forum works, I'll deny ever saying it on here. Prove me wrong.

 

And why would you deny ever saying it? You know you did.

 

Why would I want to? We both know that it happened.
You didn't admit your hypocrisy at the time, so how would I benefit from proving it again?

 

I'm interested because people on here have a bad habit of rewording quotes to say something different to what's claimed, so I'm saying I never said it on here, and that you need to prove it, or admit it was just a feeble diversion on your part.

 

Nope. We all know that you said it, which is why you didn't immediately deny it.
I called you on it at the time. You haven't forgotten it, you're just trying to bullshit and evade.

 

As you clearly state, hypocrites get offended by the truth. You seem awfully offended!...

 

I'm amused, not offended.

 

And, does that make you any less of a hypocrite?...

 

I'm not the one evading. I'm stating it quite clearly.

 

Perhaps you could find this exchange on this thread that t'other fellas on about?

 

Despite knowing that it's true. Seems utterly pointless, as anyone that posts on here knows that you said it.
If you're ashamed of your own hypocrisy, then perhaps you should stop being a hypocrite?

 

You're mixing up me not denying it, with it being true, it's not the same thing.

I'm interested in which specific exchange on this thread you're claiming to be referring to.

 

So you know exactly what I'm talking about, but you want me to post the example from a thread with hundreds of pages?
You are aware of how disingenuous that makes you sound, aren't you?

I'll give you a hint. You were constantly moaning about shooting the messenger. Ring any bells?

 

The elephants are OK. They are from the Empire you know.

 

I thought not. I don't know exactly what you're talking about at all. The messenger thing could be one of a number aimed at various posters receiving childish abuse, it doesn't support your current claim.

Are you really so desperate that you're trying to liken one comment on here, with the pages and threads from you and the other ladies, breaking board rules by posting personal details as vicitimisation and abuse aimed at one individual?

Do you think that sort of behaviour is acceptable? It would be ridiculous and unacceptable in a nursery playground. What sort of an example are you setting little Stan?

 

Here you go babycakes.

"Bless you Stan, I think you're funny, but you are usually the last one to see why people are laughing after you post."

If you can't see them laughing then how do you know they're laughing? And if you can't see that I'm usually the last one to see why they're laughing then how do you know that I'm usually the last one to see why they're laughing?

You see?

 

You are confusing us with the Express and the Fail. Selective quoting is their speciality.

 

You're dishing out childish abuse, while bemoaning childish abuse and actually doing it in this reply, bizarrely.
You're also doing it while claiming not to know what I'm referring to, which is even stranger.

The only personal details that I've seen posted of Pete are taken from his profile or linked from pages on there.
I'm not convinced that the person in the profile is actually the user of it, so I've not done that.
Feel free to show that I have, though.