Off Topic Sensible party policy suggestions (sensible ones please)

STFU!

 

From the Sensible Party page

"We will not stand for Dilly-Dallying, we will not stand for Shilly-Shallying!"

The **** is shilly-Shallying?

Do they stand for Gilly-Gallying?
What about Milly-Mallying?
Or the less popular Filly-Fallying?
These are questions that need answering!

 

http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/shilly-shally

 

Makes sense. The Sensible Party's current membership always know the right thing to do instantly.

 

Isn't that just the same thing is dilly-dallying?

 

It's got a little less procrastination in it, I think.

 

Disruptive children do not want to go to school. In order to persuade these children to behave, the educational establishments threaten greater punishments, ending in exclusion. To reiterate this, the children do not wish to attend, and if they are disruptive, the system allows them to do just that. Under the Sensible Party common sense guidlines, this seems wrong. Surely this is a reward and not a punishment?

It is proposed to remove the reward of not having to attend school. This will be replaced with the controlled application of neuro-stimulo-control (NSC), using a variety of applicators. These applicators will be made of various materials such as bamboo or wood, and can be used manually. In the case of establishments where large amounts of NSC are being dispensed, automatic electrical applicators will be made available to reduce the likelihood of RSI.

Erm..........what?



There is however an underclass of people who have no intention of ever finding work, who expect the state to provide for them whilst never putting anything back. These people are cheating the system. These people support their lazy, lounge lizard lifestyles by stealing taxes from those who work hard for a living.

The professionally unemployed are nothing more than common thieves and we will not tolerate them.

Under our policy new powers will be given to benefit officers to identify the professionally unemployed and issue them with training orders. Failure to attend a course, failure to pass a course or failure to find work after the course will result in conscription into the army for a period of not less than three years.



HAHAHAHA

 

****ing Sensible party.

Christ on a bike.
What utter, ****ing tosh.

Never read so much drivel in my entire life.
So he wants children to be beaten with bamboo if they misbehave in class?
If a teacher so much as touched my child with a bamboo stick, they would get said stick rammed straight up their arse, sideways.

And good luck enforcing army conscription.
Most of them would prefer to go to prison. I certainly would, the foods probably better, the living conditions are almost certainly better, and you have far less chance of being blown to pieces by a landmine or RPG in the nick.

 

Everyone that calls for national service or conscription has never been anywhere near the armed forces.
Why would you want a bunch of lazy, useless ****s (by this party's claims) to be defending the bloody country?
The flipside of the ****ty coin is that you're training thieves and criminals (apparently) to be killers. Great idea.

 

We propose the compulsory fitting of sub dermal hormonal birth control devices to all school children 12 years of age, which can be removed upon the completion of a certificate in parenting skills and the gaining of at least one recognised educational qualification.

This simple action will eliminate all teenage pregnancies, and ensure all new parents have the necessary skills to cope with their responsibilities.

I don't even know where to begin with this one.
ALL children to be kidnapped and mutilated with surgery. And what the **** does educational qualification have to do with Parenting?
I have a mate who is thick as two short planks, but is a great father.

 

But.....its sensible!

 

I've heard of a one party state, but never a one member party

Pete has created a World first, an officially registered political party, that has no policies and 1 member

 

Who are you to challenge the Sensible One?

This is all a bit fascist, isn't it?

 

Yeah just a little bit.

Hey @petersaxton ever thought of emigrating? Maybe somewhere like North Korea?

 

They've already got a fat, ugly lunatic as a dictator, thanks.
Maybe somewhere that's got a vacancy? Some random island with no people on it, perhaps?

 

Please feel free to email us on any subject

I have a subject, why are you such a gaping, fascist, ****ing Arsehole douchebag, Pete?

 

That's you on ignore!

 

TBF, I think the website is a wind-up. Pete's not clever enough to be that funny!...

 

They are the new force in British politics though, according to the opening paragraph

 

When you visit a poltical parties website and the first paragraph has the word "Namby-pamby" in it, then it's game over straight away I am afraid.