The EU debate - Part III

Yep that's exactly what that means. Clearly.

 

Are you the Daily Express personified?
http://www.express.co.uk/news/polit...ker-plan-economy-army-Brussels-led-superstate

 

Good job you also voted out, why would anyone want to be run by Germans?

 

He won't get it. He's already admitted himself that there's no appetite amongst the people of Europe for it.

All this indicates is closer cooperation on some things. Usual spin bollocks from The Star without the tits.,

 

Ask Nigel Farage. He's got one running his house and working as his assistant.
Oh wait, that's not right. They declared that illegal, so she now works as his assistant's assistant.

 

Here's my answer to this post expressed via the medium of contemporary dance;

please log in to view this image

 

That you Tobes? Or Sucky after one of his 'special spliffs'.

 

Well!
Their economy isn't bad.
Their universities aren't separated on class lines.
They dont allow football clubs to charge extortionate ticket prices.
They have regulated housing sector to prevent dodgy landlords profiteering.
They have a lower cost of living
They have better employment rights.
They dont spend a huge chunk of income on military or nuclear weapons they can't use without American approval.

That's just for starters

 

Nope...should be driven out of the country for being a way too accurate piece of rhyming slang

 

please log in to view this image

Sold!

 

they lost 2 wars

PS UK does not need American approval for fire nukes, its a myth

 

The delusion of the far right encapsulated in a sentence.

 

Yes they did and if the US decide to take our nuclear power away there is nothing we can do. Feel free to read the cross party commissions report that shows how dependant we are on the US saying yes for our ability to use the nuclear weapons they supply us with.
http://www.basicint.org/tridentcommission

 

Being yank owned rockets has nothing to do with the launching them.

https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/no-america-doesnt-control-britains-nuclear-weapons/

 

I have a sneaky feeling that the UK might have lost more than two wars in it's history, too.

 

Quite amusing really that the reason the US have ultimate control over whether we have a nuclear deterrent is quoted clearly within your link.

 

Not to the same scale, in fact the UK is/was quite good a winning wars, yes it lost battles but not much in the way of wars

 

Does not stop the UK from using them does it, what will they do about it, answer nothing, because you will find everyone will be too dead to care.

 

Which is why America is still part of the British Empire.