The EU debate - Part III

You think I care whether I offend you because you are looking for Nazi symbolism in a picture of the current prime minister.
Perhaps history and common sense might help you understand why your interpretation is bollocks.

 

Sounds good to me and I'm sure the UK army will work better with a European force that had a single point of command than trying to coordinate with 27 countries separately.

 

It show too much aggression to Russia, the UK's army is far more powerful than any other EU country has to offer asset wise.
Would you like to go fight for some German Chancellor because they are upset over something?

NATO is a much better.

 

An EU army is a ****ing ridiculous idea.
These imperialist douche bags need to stfu with their EU controlled border and EU controlled unified army ideas.
There is a lot of opposition to these plans though, less so now that the UK will be leaving, but like I have said before, once we are out, I couldn't give a dusty **** what the EU does, or what bullshit imperial plans it unveils.

 

And why wouldn't a European command structure not remain in NATO.
If you think our army would take part on the whim of a German chancellor then you haven't read what is being proposed.

 

Shocked.

But I'm sure the Daily Mail did a professional job of summarising it for God's Cock.

 

Well if Corbyn becomes PM we leaving NATO anyway
What a plank!

 

Both would not work.
Who would you want covering your back, French surrender monkeys or Yanks with big tanks?
The EU army would not work in the UKs interest, can you see an EU army going to stop an Argie invasion of the Falklands it it happened again?

 

Why does a trading block need a flag and an army?

 

The EU already carries out military missions on an ad hoc basis with each one setting up its own command and control structure.
No one is talking about an independent European defence force other than those who want to cause mischief.
https://fullfact.org/europe/hunt-eu-army/
Did the US join us in fighting for the Falklands? No.

 

The trading bloc is the EEA and not the EU.

 

They offered, Maggie said no

 

It started as a trading block, but progressed to what it is now

 

Making your original point irrelevant

 

Nothings irrelevant

 

http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303816504577313852502105454

 

No just facts ignored to suit a purpose

 

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/worl...ped-britain-retake-the-falklands-7618420.html

 

Thats the way politics work.

 

I lived in NYC when the Falklands occurred. The Americans thought the whole thing was hilarious. They never really took it seriously.