The EU debate - Part III

Too predictable to be funny Bo.

HIAG would have thought he'd pulled off a blinder with that one...and prattled on about it for 5 years.

 

...and total ****!...

 

why's that then?

 

They're talking about him selling Stamford Bridge tours on the snide probably.
Why that makes him a ****, not sure.
I'd say that qualifies him for knob level myself.
**** is shagging your brothers wife. Or biting someone on the pitch

 

Or even one of your best mates' wives or girlfriends?..

 

oh dear!
Do you not get English papers out there in Spain?

 

He's done some daft things like we all have.Certainly not been helped by his parents.

 

So, you're saying he didn't shag his mate, Chris Sutton's lady? The one that Sutton already had a child with?...

 

Yeah his parents are scum, without question.

 

No, he didn't.
1) It was Wayne Bridge
2) When the alleged affair took place, Bridge and Vanessa had been split for over a year
3) A newspaper leaked news of it, which both Vanessa and Terry denied
4) The newspapers withdrew their claims and issued both an apology.

 

Chris Sutton!!...wtf!

 

Hmmm....pretty thin stuff. An apology for invasion of privacy. And a very weak admission that it might be untrue.

Wayne Bridge clearly thought differently!..

 

If only spurs had a captain like him,they may have won a few more trophys.

 

Amazing how people take the bullshit the newspapers print as gospel when it suits their agenda, and as scandalous lies when it doesn't.
It may have happened. I am not sure.
But even if it did, it wasn't his "best mates wife", its was his Ex-Team mate's, Ex-girlfriend.

 

Why would Bridge blank him, like he did? Refuse to shake his hand, etc?

You're right in that we'll never be sure, but Bridge obviously had the right hump with him over whatever happened!

 

Certainly weren't his brothers wife!.... lowest of the low.

 

Who knows? Maybe Bridge believed the rumours, maybe it did happen, I dunno.
But I still find it shocking that Terry gets all that **** for allegedly ****ing his ex team mates ex girlfriend,
Where as Ryan Giggs gets less than a fraction of the stick, for ****ing his brothers wife, which we also know to be factually correct.

 

Both ****s in my book.

Giggs, for sure, you can't get much lower than that. Terry, teammate or not, they were supposed to be mates. In my book, if you're gonna do something like that, you check with your mate first.

If he's really your mate, that should be more important than some piece of pussy.

 

I find the defence of JT funny. Whether he boned his mate's ex or not (he did), the default is always "Ryan Giggs banged his sister in law" as though that excuses JT. Next step in the must defend our player argument could be "Rix groomed and ****ed his mate's underage daughter and went back to work at Chelsea the day after leaving clink".

Next?

 

... nobody is going to hold that against you mate ... fair play ... you must have been inside before they were allowed TV and internet? ..