The EU debate - Part II

So, basically, still no answer?!

You really are almost unbelievably stupid. You seem to seriously think that your usual pathetic attempts at diversion and deflection will take the topic away from your refusal to qualify your comments about Muslim families evolving with education.

In your own time, but sometime this year would be best!

 

See the reply you quoted you thick bigot.

 

As i said,i'll like anything controversial regardless of content,doesn't mean i agree with it.
Many people here seem to think you're a lying fantasist,although i reckon you believe yourself.

 

That's no answer is it, you slimy toad! That was not the point of the discussion, it was about the Queen being linked to Mohammed.

Spurlock jokingly said 'off with her head' and you popped up with your comment that you still can't or won't explain.

You still think,that you're so clever that others can't see through your views.

Keep trying!....

 

There are non so blind as those that will not see.

Both parts are answered. If you're too dim to understand them, rephrase your question and I'll happily reply.

While you're at it and as I'm humouring you and playing this wee diversion of yours by your rules, you may as well post your reply to my question.

Which is your preferred sky pixie?

Edit. If we were to stick rigidly to your rules (which you obviously won't) you should be equally challenging someone suggesting the decapitation of the reigning monarch. Particularly with events over recent years.

 

... I suspect Pete is still harbouring deep butt hurt from discovering that when one of his idols, John Major, declared "I'll regularly splash out on a curry" it wasn't actually a culinary preference... although it was definitely 'back to basics' ... at least you can always trust one party to uphold morality and values eh? ... meanwhile at the Labour party (as Pete likes to say) ...guest speaker David Mellor has arrived to speak to the opposition on the subject of foot hygiene...

 

As excuses go, that's pathetic!

 

So, yet more pathetic attempts at deflection! I suppose I should expect nothing less from a pathetic little racist prick, like you.

When, or should I say if, you feel like getting around to actually answering the question, I'm sure both Spurlock and the rest of us would be fascinated to hear it!

Or maybe I'll answer it for you! You let your mask slip, yet again, made a comment that exposed your real racist thoughts and views, and now you're desperately trying dance your way around it and hope it will all go away!

 

I've no need to make excuses.......what the easily offended think is irrelevant to me.

 

Ask your question bigot. Oh, and answer my four questions, after all, these are your rules. I'm happy to play by them

I've quite clearly said that as you're too thick to unxerstand the answers I've posted, I'll happily elborate if you clarify which bits you're struggling with.

As it is, the diversion of the diversions are all yours.

Which bit are you stuck.on?

Which is your chosen sky pixie?

Why no questions of someone suggesting decapitation of.the monarch?

Edit.
A bonus question. In what way does my reply show racist thoughts?

 

More pathetic attempts to obfuscate and divert your way around not answering the question. I knew this was coming, it's soooo predictable. You unbelievably still think you're so clever and that you can deflect your way out of your comments and nobody will notice. Well, here's your wake up call - you can't!...I won't forget it, nor will others. Expect to be hearing it for some time!

I've no more time to waste on you, you slimy racist prick.

Leave voters, like Bod, who seems to have thought the whole thing through I can respect, I disagree with him, but fair enough. It's bigoted pricks, like you, that really show what's wrong with this vote, and society in general.

 

Ask your question bigot. Oh, and answer my five questions, after all, these are your rules. I'm happy to play by them

I've quite clearly said that as you're too thick to understand the answers I've posted, I'll happily elborate if you clarify which bits you're struggling with. I'm happy to answer your question. You need to ASK it first though.

As it is, the diversion of the diversions are all yours.

Which bit are you stuck.on?

Which is your chosen sky pixie?

Why no questions of someone suggesting decapitation of.the monarch?


A bonus question. In what way does my reply show racist thoughts?

A second bonus question. How do you rationalise using the term 'bigot as an insult, and then proudly proclaim yourself to be one?

 

Hull is clearly fishing and his dubious comment has got the reaction he was hoping for.
His implication that muslims are uneducated is clear and there is no point in trying to go any further than that as you are just pandering to his goading.

 

15 Pages of nothing, try and stay on topic or this thread runs the risk of being closed again.

 

No job? You can't move to Britain: May's blueprint to curb EU migrants post-Brexit is revealed - and it will be more rigorous than points-based system

• EU citizens wanting to work in Britain would need a job before moving
• Regime will be more rigorous than the proposed points-based system
• David Davis said UK was prepared to quit single market for border control
• He said outright departure from the tariff-free zone was almost certain

Does anyone this she will get this to work?

 

Nope. It was tongue in cheek. They tried to spin it. I'm happy to play their game by their rules.

I've answered their questions, and will answer more if they need elaboration.

I doubt they'll be as obliging with the ones I asked. So who is doing the fishing?

 

... this thread has never been closed .. ...

 

Last one was

 

Still gives me the shudders knowing that Major and Eggwina 'went there'