The EU debate - Part II

I'm not, I'm simply pointing out the 'debating' style of certain posters on here.

 

That is quite special even for you.

 

So you've replied to a comment by me, using something that someone else has said? Why?

Are you still claiming that the Queen holds no positions that relate to England?

 

You are correct, in which case he lied when he said it.

 

None of the countries within the UK have a queen. The UK has a queen.
Think of it how you would a chief executive of a city council. You don't call them chief executive of each individual street.

 

Keep up lightning, they weren't Icke's quotes they were pictures google threw up you thick ****.

 

And as analogies go, that's pretty special too..

Even for you...

 

Pictures that included Icke's quotes and which referenced Icke's website.

Stand by your convictions Dull. Don't be ashamed to be turquoise.

 

David Icke. Isn't he the guy who reckons that all of the world's senior power are lizards ?

 

If it makes you happy to keep peddling that, fill your boots. It helps with your image as a simpleton.

 

Vampiric space lizards.

 

Cheers Dull. Kustard will appreciate the support. You two conversing in your pidgin English is always a good laugh!

 

And that the moon is hollow and really a space station. 'Lightning' and a few of the remoanians seem well clued up on him, which is no real surprise.

 

It was a discussion on whether there is a "Monarch of England". Both you and NSIS were arguing that there is a "Monarch of England". I explained why I didn't think that was the case. If it confuses you I accept that. If I was you I wouldn't get so confused. You should be able to see that both of you were using the same argument and my explanation applied to both of you. I replied to your comment because you were the last one to say something on the matter. I'm quite happy, after you have seen my explanation, to let you carry on saying the Queen is the "Monarch of England" without me pulling you up. You have a right to be wrong.

 

i reckon you cheer if you manage to tie your laces successfully.

 

Remoanians!!

Is that your's or Pete's?

 

Really?
Or is it that he is your friend, and you know what he is saying is horrendous, and you kinda wanna distance yourself from it, but feel you need to do something, so are taking the seemingly innocuous stance of a pseudo defence, by attacking peoples, "debating styles".....come on, fess up

 

Un-****ing-believable!....

 

We weren't both using the same argument, though. You've admitted that.
You've also repeatedly dodged the question about whether the Queen doesn't have any positions that relate to England, as you've claimed.
Could you try answering that question, please?

 

It's just me pointing out the tactic of some on here which seems to be the one you're using too.

Like the posters that do it, it really is that simple.