The EU debate - Part II

I think it's pretty obvious that you can't dig yourself out of the "Monarch of England" rubbish.

 

I think it's pretty obvious that you can't answer a simple question or back up any claim that you make.
The Supreme Governor of the Church of England doesn't hold a position that relates to England. Genius.

Any more predictions for leaving the EU, Pete? Freedom of movement, perhaps? How's that going to go?

 

"The Supreme Governor of the Church of England" is a position in the same way as "England football manager" is. Neither of them make you "Monarch of England", which is a position you have invented. Maybe you should tell her? I'm sure she will be pleased.
I would think we are going to have full control of our borders.

 

You're a colossal ****.

 

Please point out when I claimed that either of those positions made you the Monarch of England.
When you fail to do so, please admit that you were, are and forever will be wrong. Ta.

What does that mean? Why doesn't anyone on the Leave side want to answer this question?
Which system do you think that we'll adopt? May appears to have written off the points based one today.

 

I think this "Monarch of England" idea will run and run.

 

What else would you call The Queen other than the monarch then Pete??

 

Agreed! He is that!..

 

So do I. People will be calling you a **** over it for ages.

 

So why mention it? Do you still say she is "Monarch of England"?
It could mean visas or work permits.
It will mean we will be able to turn away criminals.

 

WHAT!!!!!!!!!

 

I've never said she's not a Monarch. She's the Queen of the UK and many other places but she is not the "Monarch of England".
There's seems to be some serious lack of understanding the obvious on the Remain side. Maybe they have got upset about things not going their way like those poor students who were too upset to take their exams?

 

You claimed that the Queen didn't hold any positions that related to England.
This is clearly utter nonsense, yet you can't admit it, for some reason.
The fact that she's Supreme Governor of the Church of England should show you that you're wrong, but it doesn't.

So you've got no idea what's going to happen, but this is a preferable system to the current one?
Don't you think that's a bit of an issue?

 

I wonder if this confusion in the remain side will spread?
Theresa May is Prime Minister.
Theresa May is in China.
Ergo Theresa May is Prime Minister of China!

 

Which post was that?

 

I dont think anybody in the world knows what is going to happen.
The systems I mentioned are better than uncontrolled immigration from the EU and having to let many criminals in.

 

You don't even read your own bloody comments.

If nobody knows what's going to happen, then how can you claim that it's better than what we have now?
You're literally comparing the current situation with an unknown.

 

I think it's "Nonsense Day" for the Remainers!

 

Marvellous!!!
A bookkeeper who loses track after two pages

 

I do read my own comments. So the Queen's position in the Church of England makes her "Monarch of England" in your mind?
It's better because the government will ensure they have control over immigration due to the referendum vote.
You seem to make out that because nobody knows the precise details then any of millions of scenarios is possible: "How can you say that people with two heads wont be allowed to enter the country if you say you don't know exactly what the immigration policy will be?"