You wanna be fair Piskie , get the combatants to agree to avatars now .there is nothing more fair . The only reason you are asking for examples is to try to justify the moving of the goalposts on your bet , your an easy read . if you REALLY want to make it fair , get the avatars in place now .
I hate to do this but it's 'you're' I'm not moving any goalposts, the rules are clear. Pictures to be submitted and then put to a vote, democratically decided. I have my vote, but no more influence than anybody else over the final decision.
You want fair , get them picked now . Otherwise , your just trying to justify luv asking for examples last time after he clearly stated he would pick and your opening up a pandora box when it's over ...like the last time I would think you would want a clear , no problem outcome when it's over so leave your ego picking avatar scheme out of it and put two avatars up now till they agree .....simple
Like I say , your an easy read and these rules are only in place to try to justify the callapse of the last . HAIG agreeing to YOU overseeing this would have been a laugh ....but nice try . One would only imagine what you would have picked if he lost in your version of " Fairness . And if I was the two combatants I would agree to avatars now over Piskies head because it's the fairest ...period For Piskie not to want avatars in place now ...speaks volumes to motive . Good luck to both
I don't have to do anything past looking at how desperate you were to get HAIG to agree to this bet with you in charge ....like I say , your an easy read . Fair = avatars in place now , you just wanted the " Clan " to be able to vote the worst possible avatar if HAIG lost I'm sure HAIG sees right through you too and is why he wouldn't take the bet with you in charge
Just want things fair THIS TIME Luv , you said YOU would pick last time and at the end asked for examples. And where did it get you , a pissed off Piskie relegated to putting up the avatar HE PICKED on his own name angrier than hell . There is nothing more fair than the avatars in place now , to fight against that shows there is another " Con " in the making .
I put "welching" in inverted commas for a reason, Sky. There is bound to be a loophole that you'll be able to exploit for wum purposes. I'll be gravely disappointed if you didn't use whatever becomes available to you in order to give Pixie the hissy-fits. I'll put you in touch with my Brief (Roofie), who some are calling Mr Loophole.
This is a desperate , telling post to the motive of Piskie . It's a " Lure " to get HAIG to agree so piskie and the people who hate HAIG ( most on here ) can vote the most belittling avatar . You get the avatars picked now and you have a nice quiet , fair outcome in the end ...simple . But I get the feeling Piskie doesn't want simple , he simply wants him and his clan to use the rules against an unliked poster
It pains me to do this but it's collapse. Also in the name of fairness how could you be both combatants? Hardly fair!
One of the clans " votes " raises his ugly head . To fight against having avatars put at the ready now , the fair way , shows all .
