The EU debate - Part II

Explain what is wrong and why, please?

 

Your use of pidgin English, as referred to earlier, for a start. I don't really care but you seem to feel the need to pick people up on typos. I suspect it's part of your need to feel superior. I bet you're the cleverest bloke in your company.

 

How is it pidgin English? What is the correct grammar?
When did I pick anybody up on typos?

 

I think you're intentionally trying to make this conversation as mundane as possible so I can't be bothered to continue with it and you can claim some sort of victory. Congratulations, Pete.

 

So you criticise my English but you are unable to say what is wrong. You are also unable to justify your claim that I pick people up on typos. You sound like one of these characters who simply criticises without justification. You are a very inadequate person.

 

Pete's life story - http://www.petersaxton.co.uk/aboutus.html

Please note that he's still using the same name as he was in 1986.

 

Pete sermonising on another forum - https://www.financebanter.co.uk/uk-finance/8189-nhs-pension-5.html

 

It seems Pete relies on these forums to boost his ego by telling everyone how clever he is and how stupid everyone else is.

Perhaps if he was that clever then his insight would be valued rather than seen as an ego trip of a very sad man.

 

I will save a lot of arguments

TTIP will not happen, its dead in the water, says the Germans

 

I think you are telling everybody how stupid you are by your comments about "free movement". Watford_R must realise that his criticisms - which he can't justify - shows how stupid he is. I don't think I can take credit for highlighting the stupidity you both displayed.

 

Bodes well for our trade agreement with the US given Obama said they are prioritising the EU.

Oops!

 

I like the fact that he pontificates about being self employed as if it makes him automatically a Leader of men and a Captain of industry

And yet after 30 years he's amounted to this;

https://www.google.co.uk/maps/place...6656!4m2!3m1!1s0x0:0x9826bbd68275aeb5!6m1!1e1

 

Says the man who thinks he might be related to an encryption protocol on an RFId chip.

 

Watford_R: "You are using pidgin English"
PS: "Can you explain, please?"
Watford_R: "I can't be bothered"
steveninaster1: "That's an example of PS boosting his ego and showing how stupid other people are!"

Watford_R: "You criticise people for making typos"
PS: I don't. Can you give an example?
Watford_R: "I can't be bothered"
steveninaster1: "That's an example of PS boosting his ego and showing how stupid other people are!"

 

Do you simply come out with lies all the time? When did I say that? You seem to be getting me confused with somebody who asked a question but then couldn't seem to explain his question.

 

Flipped!

 

Good luck with that one.

They don't answer questions too often.

They typify the definition of 'bigot' that they liberally apply to others.

A person who is intolerant towards those holding different opinions:

 

I didn't say I was of the opinion that there was any relationship. I simply thought he was totally confused and helping him out but he didn't seem to be capable of explaining what he meant? I notice how you missed out the confused person's change of question.