The EU debate - Part II

Not sure the popularity of May has helped at the G20 today. Sounds like the rest of the world would like some answers as to what Brexit is.

 

That depends on the negotiations. I don't think anybody tends to say what the result of negotiations are going to be before they happen. At least people who voted leave seem to understand that.

 

You love stating the obvious, that you think others don't understand that shows a falsely entitled arrogance. I'm sure world leaders also understand this but it won't stop them explaining their position in relation to brexit.

It also doesn't stop the Japanese from telling the UK to be careful not to lose its Japanese car manufacturing, for America to say Pacific and EU trade agreements come first and for China to ask when the nuclear power stations it has been investing in will be built.

 

I don't know what drives his arrogance. He's laid his life bare for all to see and it's clear that he's achieved very little professionally and is in ****ing horrendous physical condition.

 

So you say something silly and when I explain why it is silly you say I am stating the obvious. You then seem to applaud other world leaders for stating the obvious.

 

Great website though

 

The only silly thing is you thinking the rest of us who have been through 1000s of posts on this thread need the current situation regarding brexit explaining.

We don't and it does nothing to further the discussion.

 

Just as long as you understand it is sensible not to expect to know the result of negotiations before they happen. Hopefully all the idiots who complain that they don't know what things are going to be like after we leave the EU are going to shut up and stop being silly. Until that happens we will have to state the obvious to the idiots.

 

All you've done across hundreds of pages of discussion is state the most basic and obvious facts with an arrogance of someone providing a profound insight that no one else could come up with.

 

As predicted - you've got **** all to demonstrate the supposed racism from the posters you suggested had demonstrated it.

No matter, I'll mark it down as yet another fail from Dull from Hull

 

Spot on and sadly rather tedious.

 

I think the plan is to drone on making the same obvious points repeatedly until people get exasperated with it and give up.

 

What I have been doing is explain simply and clearly what you don't seem to understand. If you don't want to be told the obvious then start to understand the obvious. It's your own fault for talking nonsense.

 

I've come to the same conclusion. Every discussion I've had with him appears to dissolve into a battle of who can post last.

 

I think you're confused, Pete. I've not contributed to the thread for many pages but have had a scan across the last few pages and, like the rest of the thread, the ongoing theme is everyone understanding the points you make as they are all painfully simple but your own arrogance and sense of intelligence and importance meaning you think you're educating people and adding anything worthwhile to the discussion.

 

He clearly does understand as do we all, you're offering nothing that provides any insight whatsoever, which makes your pompous patronising tone even more laughable.

You'd put a glass eye to sleep with your facile, boring, ****e

 

So you agree that what I have said is right?

 

The parts which are painfully simple facts that a child could understand, especially after you repeat them several times, are right, obviously.

It is akin to someone saying ten times that the sky is blue with an ever increasing sense of profundity.

 

They're still there Mr Scarecrow.

WHAT RACE ARE IMMIGRANTS?



LABOUR have suspended 18 members for racism or anti-Semitism since Jeremy Corbyn was elected last September.

The Racist, Anti-Semitic, Threatening Abuse That Barred Applicants From Labour Leadership Election

The full scale of the racist, anti-semitic, sexist and threatening online abuse of those barred from Labour’s leadership election has been revealed by the party’s general secretary.

Iain McNicol has written to members of the party’s ruling National Executive Committee (NEC) to rebut claims from Jeremy Corbyn, John McDonnell and others that people are being unfairly denied votes in the contest.

In a note obtained by HuffPost UK, the general secretary lists the shocking nature of the abuse that has been picked up by party staff, with applicants barred for making threatening posts on social media and for using words such as ‘Zio’, ‘Paki’, ‘******’, ‘c*nt’.

Among the messages highlighted by McNicol are:



‘the world we live in once we’ve despatched the zio creeps’

‘if every woman in the world was like Angela Eagle, the human race would die out’

‘paki landlord’

‘Labour will always cover up for Paki Muslim rapist scum’.

“Labour the **** party who will found ISLAMIC public schools

“it’s the Israeli Mossad organised collection orchestrating the attack up the members’ choice, Jeremy Corbyn”.

HuffPost UK has been told that others excluded from the ballot include those with suspected terrorist convictions, and one applicant who was found to have desecrated a war memorial.

 

They're not wrong about Eagle.