The EU debate - Part II

They do, its just not so highly published.

 

Everything I do is in my own time. It certainly doesn't need your permission. I posted it earlier, several times, so I'll leave it to you to find, rather than going over the same points again. I know doing that upsets you, but at least you can see a first hand example of why it happens.

 

This is the only PM exchange between us.

Dated June 11 2016, headlined "Rant" and started by you after you'd announced that only ****s and mongs wanted to stay in the EU.

-

Kustard: Sorry, I like a rant Not very good at getting my point across in text, especially when I suffer dyslexia. Still Liverpool FC are still **** in or out the EU

please log in to view this image

Stan: Yeh, I thought the mong **** stuff was a bit unnecessary.

Kustard: Was meant as a bit of a joke, but it did not work

-

Feel free to prove otherwise Kustard.

 

Rattled by what?

You have convinced yourself as much as your 2 playmates that you are ITK, when we both know you are absolutely clueless.

Priceless

 

If you say so

 

They will and the conclusion they will probably come to is that it was as much about eurosceptics in the tory party, a dishonest campaign, a lukewarm warm remain campaign. Mostly what will be discussed will be how Cameron was forced into the referendum, a labour party in dissarray and then the fall out and effects of brexit.
I'm sure Farage will get a mention but probably more in relation to his parties poster campaign and the fact he wasn't included in the leave campaign. If I was to pick a figure who will stand out in the aftermath it will be Boris. Stabbed his mate in the back and then led the campaign to beat the prime minister of the day, only then to be stabbed in the back himself and end up helping to lead the negotiations out of europe

 

Feel free to try prove me wrong at anytime

 

What a load of bitter ****e.

 

please log in to view this image

 

Say hi to Martin from me

 

I know of 3. Any one in particular?

Don't be shy

 

I think it's a fairly balanced view. History loves the intrigue and infighting. That Farage was not included in the official leave campaign is a very interesting point which suggests his views for leaving did not match those who are now implementing it.

 

So you've got nothing that shows racism being displayed by us.

Thanks for confirming

 

https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=w...ome..69i57.14201j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=w...ome..69i57.26304j0j9&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

 

He patently likes the thought of that ale swilling, xenophobic, tit, being lauded by future generations as the man responsible for ****ing up the British economy

But of course he didn't vote for him....

 

Apart from the bits I mention in this thread.

 

I never said I liked that idea, or that I didn't vote for him.

See what I mean about you trying to build an argument on views not offered.

 

That you won't repost as they're nonsense and you'd make yourself look a right **** again if you posted them as somehow being 'proof' of racism being displayed in the context of this debate about that **** Farage.

 

I didn't say I wouldn't repost them.

 

Yawn, your usual semantics, your staunch defence of him says all that needs to be said about your view on the man and his politics.