The EU debate - Part II

As I said, just an observation that you're a self confessed racist. It's probable that many of the people you associate with hold the same views as most normal people would avoid associating with scum like you. Unless you are too much of a coward to air your true beliefs in public?

 

Fixed your ****ed up quote box so that I can point out that you"be STILL posted no proof at all.

If the images you posted were proof, Farage would be in trouble with the powers that be. He isn't.

In fact, he doesn't mention race. You just assume that immigrants are a different race. That makes YOU the racist bigot.

Have another go.

 

The Barnsley bigot, Kitchen Pete and Simpleton Kustard will be seething at this news

Syrian refugee places for 20,000 'secured' in UK

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-37268971

 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...rter-candidates-embroiled-homophobic-row.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/pol...and-racists-stand-as-election-candidates.html

They've put up dozens of candidates who are known racist scumbags. It's the party that the far right align with. It doesn't make every UKIP voter racist by default, but they're highly likely to be xenophobes imo, oh and ****ing morons.

 

They were both just voices for an ideal they were not in control of. Helping to influence whilst not wielding any power.

 

Good for them, all living near you.

Have a nice day

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-27151509

Ukip bans racists.

There are lists of convicted criminals in the various parties. It fills many pages. I don't think UKIP gets a mention.

 

You do like your Americanisms Kustard. Are you American or do you just watch a lot of Jerry Springer?

 

One was the legal voice of the people that democratically elected him. The other was hung.

It's a really poor comparison.

 

**** wouldn't ****ing dare.

 

No, Farage is not in parliament or a member of the government. Just like Haw Haw he had no control over the result or the ideal he espoused.

The real players in history are those pulling the strings, not those on the sidelines cheering them on.
That the leave campaign didn't include him spoke volumes for their methods as it meant Farage could say what he liked without them having to be accountable for it and if they won they had no need to include him.

 

Do you actually know the meaning of 'non sequitur'. You said that Farage left more of a mark on UK history than those who whine. A little while later I said so did Lord Haw-haw. How does that not follow. The real non sequitur is your introduction of the requirement to be legally and democratically elected to make a mark on UK history. Will you now explain why that is relevant.

 

He is English you clot

 

He is an elected MEP

 

So that's a yes then, you're a big fan of white trash TV. No surprise!

 

It means 'does not follow' your example does not fit the argument. Like your reaction to the referendum result, it simply shows your poor understanding of democracy.

 

Labour and Tories have never done such a thing, honest, at least UKIP sack them, Labour let the back in.

 

Im lost, "he is English" does not mean I watch it, you silly child., still I will leave you to it, much to do today.

 

UKIP put up known racist candidates at the election - fact

 

He did well to make all those speaches in the EU parliament then.