Light sentence because he was a Brit. Lucky they didn't do him for pillow biting too. Isn't it illegal over there?
He WAS allowed a lawyer but had to let them go as he couldn't pay them But don't let the truth spoil your argument Also with no access to phones or the outside world, it makes you wonder how he made all those statements that you yourself posted at the time
Either that or risk not waking up in the morning. For a Country that is so wealthy, they aren't arf backwards. Not one of us would trust their judicial system.
But David Haigh did when he went there think g they were going to offer him another wedge of cash. Be careful you don't end up looking like an idiot by appearing to believe Haigh on Twitter. Sorry mate but it's odd that he has latched onto your supportive post. No disrespect to you but you are a complete stranger to him and have no facts on what happened.
There's no reason why we can't have reasonable debate. Whose gonna kick o..... errrrr Whose gonna starttt......... ummmm Lets go..............
Somebody has already kicked off IMO but I won't be getting involved. There is nothing new to add s o will keep out of this now.
There are two sides to every story. Whilst we are in receipt of small bits of evidence, which we can piece together however we choose fit, none of us are aware what really happened. If Haigh had nicked 4m, the British authorities would have been after him as apposed to the wide spread corruption that is Saudi law As far as I can see nobody has kicked off, nor should they. Yes I'm a complete stranger to Haigh, as are you; unless have something to tell us about that special handshake!
Until he had been tried in a British Court of law that's exactly what I am saying. The supposed theft took place in England, therefor the English authorities should have investigated it. For whatever reason they were, and aren't interested.
I think I need to go find something else to do. Not sure I can be arsed reading this ****e all through the international break. Hopefully the window closing will give us something positive and relevant to LUFC to talk about instead. Oh **** what am I saying?
Glory, if you can tell me how your opinion is any more valid than mine, I will gladly change my opinion. Firstly, (and only if you are able to) answer my question on post 77.
