The EU debate - Part II

Firstly: what exactly is 'internet wealth'?

And secondly: When have I ever mentioned my socio-economic status, my earnings, my lifestyle or anything other than that I work for the Welsh Government and live in Cardiff.

You seem obsessed with this issue, but as far as I can see you are the only one who keeps going on about your professional status, the fact you run your own company, your two (or is it three?) kitchens, your converted offices at your home. I certainly haven't, and I haven't seen anyone else either - besides some posters saying that they live abroad now either because they've retired or for work.

 

I guess we can assume logic isn't very sensible as he seems to have gone off the rails and isn't being very logical with his posts...

 

My party was registered in 2015. So are you saying that somebody who was writing a blog pretending it was a political party in 2005 would decide to wait ten years before registering their party? You obviously don't do common sense.
You are lying when you say that Peter Saxton has this blog when he doesn't. You also said that Peter Saxton made comments about prisoners. Neither of those statements are true and you know you are simply making it up. You are lying because you are a liar. It's what you do. Now you try to justify it by saying it's an "assumption". You know that doesn't get you off the hook. You are spreading lies about me. Please desist.

 

I have told you not to say that the blog you refer to is nothing to do with me. Please desist from inferring there is any connection either directly or indirectly.

 

It's not sensible to use double negatives when demanding things from people.

 

You are right: Do not say that the blog you refer to is anything to do with me.

 

I didn't say it was anything to do with you. I just pointed out that the policies within it are equally as ludicrous as the ones you post on here.

 

So in 2015 you set up a party, you name that party, then register it but you did not do a basic Google check on the name you chose?
That seems a bizarre way for the founder of The Sensible Party to act in my opinion.
And again...I did not lie. I made a logical assumption. You say I am wrong so I have not repeated it as I have no way of knowing whether the blog is related and as you say it ain't and I have no proof it would be unkind on my part.
None of that means I lied...to lie you must knowing make up a fact with nothing to back it up...I made a deduction (in my view a logical one) based on your party and the blog having the EXACT SAME name.
However your faux outrage is a bit ****ing rich considering you assumed I had been in prison ... so we're you lying when you wrote that?
Get off your high horse...I made an assumption and now it's gone

 

What would be the point of a google check? I wasn't looking for a name. I had decided on a name. I knew several years ago somebody had the domain name but I waited for it to lapse.
You didn't make a logical assumption. You said "Peter Saxton" had posted those comments but there is no evidence of that. You seem to think that because there is a registered party then anybody else using the same party name must be the same person. That is irresponsible in the extreme. You don't seem to understand the concept of plurality. Why would anybody with a domain name not use it if they were publicising it on the internet? It is so ridiculous it is beyond belief.
To sum up: Somebody gets a domain name and starts blogging. I, who liked the name from Monty Python, realised that the domain name was taken. When the domain name lapsed I registered the domain and party. Next I will get the blog discontinued or the person will have to change the name.
I didn't assume you were in prison. You announced you were in prison!: "Says the man who gave us prisoners running around on giant hamster wheels to produce electricity." "Us prisoners" could easily mean "prisoners such as me". I had never said that so I had no idea there was any justification for you to, erroneously, make out I had referred to it.

 

Doggy do do?

 

This is going nowhere...I have written several times that I made an assumption...you believe I am a liar and there is not going to be resolution to this.

Your explanation about assuming I had been a prisoner was not based on fact...it was based on your reading of my post...you made an assumption.
I can see that ... but you seem incapable of seeing that there was logic to my assuming the two names were linked.

you ask what the point of doing a search is...well for one thing no one would assume that your The Sensible Party organisation was connected to the The Sensible Party political blog.

Finally...at the risk of incurring you ire ... I did not lie.
If I had then I would have continued to say that it was your blog but after you made it clear that the blog was not yours I did not claim it was.
I think I have derailed this thread enough so will bow out and let it return to the calm, well thought debate that I so rudely interrupted.

 

What ****ing calm, thought out debate??....

 

If no one breaks my arm, throws socks of piss at me or tries to bite me it counts as a calm day

 

I take my lad to his cricket match (his team won, he got man of the match) and miss Pete going loopier.

He also seems to have confused Smirnoff with NSIS. I guess it's difficult to keep up when you're being pilloried by multiple posters on several message boards!

 

https://unidirectory.auckland.ac.nz/profile/p-saxton

Peter Saxton's area of expertise- "gay and bisexual men".

 

Fair enough!

 

I can see somebody is obsessed with me - or is it that guy you are interested in?

 

Low expectations stop me being disappointed

 

As a bit of an amateur psychologist, you're one of the board's most interesting posters. Not as interesting as Bluey or Ossie of course, but unlike just about anyone I've encountered before.

 

Bluey still lurks and he's a big fan of Pete!

He's too much of a coward to post though after his latest attention seeking "I'm leaving" hissy fit. What a daft **** he is