The problem I have with this (and with ACS) is that neither of you are overly convincing. That can be the game sometimes though.
Firstly, ACS didn't get a definite investigation result when it says the role should be fully investigated. However, he did get my role right (though as a 1 in 3 chance). Could he have done this with guesswork? I did drop a clue to my role, but nobody seemed to pick up on it. However, his determination to steer us away from DPP seems strange.
Secondly, you claim to have been told that Valley was Sheriff, when in fact you would probably just be told he was dead. It's a bit tough on you having to declare your results after everyone has claimed roles as it means you are revealing already revealed info.
Not sure at all about this one.
Timing again.Well, I was expecting more of a response. Earth shattering news and ....

The result was in the past tense. "...was Sherriff."
Look at info and tell me just between Chippy and me which seems most likely. Has to be me.
lads well done.