I call a **** a **** & a prick a prick. Call it as I see it. You go for the patronising pseudo-intelligent approach along with abuse. It doesn't work, you're a thick ****. Have you got the reasoning as to why the name change would have been good for the club? You've even defended kids & oldies getting charged more under the new membership scheme. A proper ****. A measure of the man "Bastards, Bum chums, limp dick, you sponging tosser, Gobshite, dickhead, Give you time to bugger your "lad," Not bad abuse wise,. You're a hypocrite as well as a **** & a prick. These posts of your just about sum you up. "Much Ado About Nothing. I go with my Brother. This will save us a significant amount of money. Which is good. Don't see why we should be subsidising other peoples kids.Don't care where we sit (Ha!) as long as we have a decent view. We go to watch Hull City play football, and hopefully win, not to join a choir or listen to some drunken half-wit telling professional footballers that he/she could do the job better. If you don't like it I suggest you protest in the strongest possible terms by not taking up "membership". Pay as you go or don't go.I don't like Speedway, but instead of whining about it I don't go, and leave those who do to enjoy it. Easy." "Why should I subsidise your kids? Look after them yourself you sponging tosser." "As if I care about your valueless opinion? If you don't like the new system stop going" "Self opinionated gobshite. If someone doesn't agree with you they're a troll? Dickhead." "Seems you two are on the same wavelength. Bum chums? Hopefully the new system is implemented and you both stop going." "You don't know how many kids will be forced to stop going, you don't know how many pensioners will stop going. You are just whining because you always do about any change. Trying to claim the moral high ground by simpering about "the kids". What about the disabled, the unemployed, the nurses and junior Doctors who are now working Saturdays? I'm not the one trying to price out long term HCFC supporter, you are. There are a damn sight more who go without kids etc who will benefit from this change. The greatest good for the greatest number. But that doesn't fit your anti Club agenda." ""People" don't, only you and a few of your bumchums on here. Who I don't really regard as proper people. I have to go now, so perhaps we can continue this exchange of abuse on Saturday? If you are not busy then." "Give you time to bugger your "lad" without having to type." Have you reported that post yet? ****s like you, I **** 'em. Now **** off Mr No Values, Mr No Principles, Mr Hypocrite, Mr Allam Whore, Mr Boo Boy, Mr Prick, Mr ****.
Burns is saying it's a punt but he wouldn't be posting complete speculation if he hadn't a nod from a source it was more likely than not they are the prospective buyers. There seems to be separate corroborating rumours now - from those who don't claim to know it all but don't post **** either. I think it is likely the Chinese and Americans were bidding against eachother; the chinese won and favour a new broom approach, with Chapman and Bruce et al ultimately being casualties of the failure of the Greive bid. We're probably in due diligence now which explains the lack of activity on the transfer front and Mooney jumping ship before he becomes surplus to requirements. That's my guess at least..... ....or at least what I hope is true.
Which bit? The other guess would be that some heads of terms were agreed with the Chinese around the time of the sky story as realisation dawned they'd twatted the colonials around on the odd occasion too many. They clearly want out and will be dealing with the club on a cost-neutral basis until they offload. They seem to be struggling with deals more than originally anticipated due to the complete lack of stability at the top, dirth of effective communication and the negative coverage this will inevitably attract. Despite their apparent shortcomings I can't believe Allamhouse would deliberately and systematically devalue their own asset, simply to spite a the club's supporters and intransigent local media and governmental institutions. If there are no heads of terms presently agreed and books aren't currently open, then a september transaction seems very optimistic indeed relative to a deal of this size.... I hope they know what they're doing. Unnervingly I'm less sure they do than I should be.
