Premier League - Joint approach to improve behaviour announced please log in to view this image Premier League, EFL and FA to ask match officials to take stronger position towards players and managers Premier League football, and the wider game in England, is known for being competitive and compelling, but also for its fairness and for being played in the right spirit. However, the English football authorities have noticed over the past four seasons that intolerable behaviour by players and managers in their competitions have reached unacceptable levels in certain areas. Therefore the Premier League, EFL and The FA have announced a collective undertaking to improve behaviour across the game. Their undertaking will task the Professional Game Match Officials (PGMO) to take a stronger position and action towards unacceptable participant conduct. This will focus on behaviour towards match officials, with the aim of reducing disrespectful conduct such as aggressively challenging decisions or running from distance to confront an official. The PGMO will apply the Laws of the Game to manage rigorously the following incidents of bad behaviour with the following sanctions. Dissent towards match officials Yellow cards will be issued to players who: Show visibly disrespectful behaviour to any match official Respond aggressively to decisions Confront an official face to face Run towards an official to contest a decision Offensive, insulting or abusive language and/or gestures towards match officials Red cards will be issued to players who confront match officials and use offensive, insulting or abusive language and/or gestures towards them. Physical contact with match officials A yellow card for physical contact with any match official in a non-aggressive manner (e.g. an inquisitive approach to grab the official’s attention). A red card for physical contact with match officials in an aggressive or confrontational manner. Surrounding match officials A yellow card for at least one player when two or more from a team surround a match official. The FA will continue to sanction teams when they surround match officials. Conduct in the technical area please log in to view this image Behaviour by players and club staff in the technical area will be more rigorously enforced The requirements of the Technical Area Code of Conduct will be more rigorously enforced for players and club staff. Additionally, match officials will be required to retain professional detachment from players and club staff at all times. "We and our clubs have been discussing for some time concerns that certain elements of player behaviour are overstepping the mark and it is our collective position that these types of behaviour should no longer be tolerated,” Richard Scudamore, Executive Chairman, the Premier League said. "Things happen in the heat of the moment during fast and highly competitive football; we still want to see the passion fans enjoy and demand, but players and managers have to be aware there are lines that should not be crossed.” http://www.premierleague.com/news/65240
About time. Should be an interesting first couple of months until teams realise what they can and can't get away with.
I would have rather seen the 10 yds rule they have in Rugby, any back chat to the ref move the ball 10 yards forward, that would soon stop it.
They introduced it before, the refs implemented it for about 3 months and then everyone forgot about it.
For ****s sake, a yellow card for running towards the ref? Presumably they're still going to get decisions wrong so players should at least get these cards rescinded if turns out the ref ****ed up.
The one official who I think needs more protection than anybody is the 4th official , he must have a hell of an ear bashing by the end of the game.
I couldn't disagree more. For me it doesn't matter if the ref is wrong or not, the players shouldn't be running towards them and intimidating them.
They didn't forget about it, FIFA scrapped it, apparently it was causing confusion in countries that didn't play rugby (that was seriously the reason given). It was rather more than three months though, the rule was actually trialed for four years (it was scrapped in 2005).
I never said the rule was scrapped after 3 months. I meant the refs stopped penalising for it after 3 months and everyone forgot about it. If you can show me someone penalised for it 3 years and 9 months into the trial then I'll take it back. You do love a good Google...
