Off Topic EU deabte. Which way are you voting ?

He's as much of a middle-aged bigot as Pete.

 

He wasn't proven to be anything of the sort in 2005 though. Many suspected he'd been lying through his teeth over WMD's like, but not even the Tories were labelling him as a war criminal.

 

Legally, yes they could.

Morally, no they couldn't

You confused the 2....

 

If Parliament is sovereign maybe the Labour Party members can have a referendum to elect the leader? If Corbyn is re-elected the Members of Parliament can ignore the result of the referendum - because it is only advisory - and vote for the Labour Party leader. The non-Labour Party MPs wont vote because they will be rolling around on the floor laughing.

 

There's a case for morally voting against it. If your constituents happened to be majority remain and you were leaning that way also. You represent your constituents. What would you do in that situation Tobes?

 

Shout and scream?

 

I am supreme chancellor of the party

 

How did you get elected leader of the Sensible Party? Especially when your wife probably voted for the bloke next door.

 

You're confusing him with your Deputy Leader.

 

This would've been a good start http://www.eureferendum.com/documents/flexcit.pdf
But there are other examples where academics have considered the problems and come up with coherent plans. I also believe the markets would be less volatile and EU more willing to negotiate if the positions were clear from the outset. Of cause they will always be objectives and no one can guarantee the future

 

How do you start a political party and not be able to think of a single policy for 16 months? Anyone here who knows the answer to that? I'd be interested to know. What kind of mastermind comes up with such a profound plan?

 

'coherent' is a word Pete struggles with

 

Phase 3 - So they want a Europe wide single market (what does that mean exactly?) and how will they achieve it if any country disagrees with "the plan"?

 

When it comes to coherent plans, is it wise to ask someone who hasn't come up with a coherent plan for a political party he created 16 months ago?

 

Well they wouldn't ask you, that's for sure. You can't come up with a policy for your own political party you idiot.

 

See pages 155-175 for details.

 

They dont seem to understand the wish of the British people to decide our own laws. They don't seem to understand that the EU or other countries may not agree to "the plan".

 

I reckon we give independence to London, but let it rule Scotland, Northern Ireland and Liverpool as satellite states and we have a new capital in Birmingham


They'll have a few problems though. They can't even manage to get people too and from work in that there London.

 

One of the policies of The Sensible Party is as follows:

Split the UK into the following -

Parts of England:-

North East
North West
Yorkshire and the Humber
East Midlands
West Midlands
East of England
South East
South West
London
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regions_of_England

Other countries:-
Scotland
Northern Ireland
Wales

The UK Parliament will decide on matters that need to be decided at a state level and matters that can be decided on a regional level with be decided by a regional parliament.

I think that this idea is much better than the muddle that we have at present as to how Scotland is funded as well as many other issues.

When time allows other policies will be released and they will all be on the website.

Be Sensible - Vote Sensible

 

Enough of all this divisiveness, the north and south should unite, and kick the **** out of the brummies.