Off Topic EU deabte. Which way are you voting ?

and stop playing on dusty wickets against Pakistani and Indian bowlers. The Pie and Mash brigade may be able to help with that.

 

Sensible teams Pete.

 

I see where you are coming from

 

I not voting a Liverpool fan in for PM

 

Even by your own piss poor standards, that really is a ****e attempt at trying to rewrite what's written in order to cover up.your failure.

Have some dignity for once. You ****ed up again. Deal with it.

 

****ed up with what exactly?

I've re-written nothing.

You said Remain was racist - your words

You said that Donga had somehow contradicted my point about your total idiocy - go ask him for his view you spineless goon. Let me know when you have, as I could do with another laugh at your expense.

 

The original comments are still there, and in context.

 

Who ever said it was? Your making an argument that was never there! All I said was it's hilarious that the 3 that lead us into this mess have jumped ship. And they've even jumped ship without a whiff of a plan between the 3 of them.

You also know little about my default mode so no need to be so patronising, especially when you misunderstood a simple post.

 

I'll re-post them - in context - as you appear to have suffered selective memory loss.

Some voted remain, because closing EU borders to largely white immigrants would open the borders to areas of the world with darker skins.
The remain position is more racist than the leave.


"Europeans are largely white, and similar "race" depending how you want to define it. They get open access. The ones limited include all the other "races". If a company or political party applied a similar system of screening applicants, they'd find themselves pilloried for racism."


It's a statement of fact. The current EU immigration policy discriminates against people of colour

 

Interesting to see people make light of a couple of alleged mass murderers, but are outraged at some moron painting a statue.

 

Do you know what 'context' means?

 

What possible further context is going to change what you wrote there?

You absolute clown. No wonder you're back peddling and deflecting away from them though, as they were ****ing embarrassing.

 

Do you include IS in that mix?

 

You seem to think that repeating the same bollocks, somehow magically makes it true.

I'm not back peddling from anything I put, I stand by every word until someone points at a good reason why not.

You haven't been able to do that, and that's why you've floundered and tried to rewrite the question.

 

n

I asked you to prove the statements you made.

You couldn't, constantly swerved it, and just posted your usual inane drivel and deflection.

Your statements are therefore complete bollocks as the burden of proof is yours love, that's how this works.

It's nothing more the brain fart of an internet noddy unless you can back it up.

Seeing as I've been waiting for you to do so all morning, I'd say the likelihood of you actually doing so, is slim to **** all.

 

• Britain’s construction industry has suffered its worst month since the aftermath of the financial crisis in 2009, in a clear signal that the EU referendum has hurt the economy.

• Data firm Markit found that activity shrank sharply in June, with firms reporting a big drop in new orders. Many clients were unwilling to commit to projects before the referendum on 23rd June.

 

There are approximately 105 million people in Europe who are classed as an ethnic minority, they have the same rights within the EU as everyone else so that is why your statement is wrong.

 

He's never wrong mate, apart from virtually every time he touches the keyboard.

 

Nonsense. You tried to rewrite the question. It is quite simply a statement of fact to say that the EU policy discriminates against non EU countries. It's what it's designed to do. It's also a statement of fact that the majority of EU countries are predominantly white, and the ruling excludes countries that are predominantly black.

By accident or design, it racially discriminates.

 

Nope. The fact some get in is neither here nor there, it doesn't justify the exclusion of the others.