Off Topic EU deabte. Which way are you voting ?

No worries, his mate Hull(DIMD) has come to support him. Perhaps he needs a new kitchen? Pete's got loads...!

 

Aye, whenever they get big holes picked in their argument, they flood the thread with inane bollocks in the hope people don't notice their failings.

 

Oh, look. Talk of inane bollocks..and there it is..!

 

Nobody's any better than anyone else on here fella, that's the real delusion.

 

As the Remainers continue on their losing way the people who won the vote look forward to more success. The Conservative Party choose who is going to run the country while the Labour Party can't even run themselves. If the Remain people are confused about whether there's a constitution or not how can they be expected to understand anything.
Still, they have hope: the think the referendum result is going to be overturned.
They'll be wrong there as well. Democracy messes up all their plans to run things. All they have is lies and dreams. Unfortunately, "internet wealth" doesn't pay the bills. You'll have to go back to your dead end jobs to survive.

 

To be fair I'm yet to see evidence of either of Pete's supposed kitchens. I believe him about the shower rooms though.

 

They don't even understand their own minds.

 

Certainly can't understand yours!...

 

Absolutely, it's sad to see some that are even stupid enough to claim that the nothing they know, is better than the nothing someone else knows. How pathetic is that really?

How do such fragile ego's get through life?

Why can't they just discuss instead of compete, especially when they're rubbish at it?

 

Certifiable!

Out of interest Pete, do you think any Tories voted Remain? I ask because your, increasingly unhinged, rants are starting to focus on the Labour party.

 

I know. You can only get your head round saying you were a city trader and have "internet wealth" but can't work out how to manufacture evidence to prove it when sensible point out you are lying. Every Walter Mitty is "wealthy" on the internet.
I had a girlfriend in 1980 and after the SAS Iranian Embassy siege she told me about all the guys who would try to chat her up claiming to be in the SAS. She wasn't stupid either - she knew they were sad inadequates.

 

Well you'd have to ask anyone that continues to labour the point for 300 pages on an internet forum? I would suggest that anyone who continues to do the same is probably not best placed to ask though, might smack of hypocrisy.

 

What you on about? I couldn't give a toss what you read, it's what you write that is the problem

 

Talking of very fragile egos, check out the the Hull dumb & dumber. They cannot be told anything, are always right about everything and anybody who dares to disagree is stupid.

Pete is hilarious. Those two, are just typical Yorkie megabores.

 

Absofuckinglutely brilliant.

Your clients would love some of the crackpot stuff you've posted on here!

By the way, I'm going to need to see evidence of the girlfriend. Perhaps you could kill two kitchens with one bird and take a picture of her perched on both of your kitchen sinks.

 

I think you were wrong to remove the paragraph before that Stan. The irony of the whole post was brilliant

 

I guess you would think that way.

I guess I'm just an optimist that thinks that there's someone looking in capable of adult conversation.

 

Pete, you really do exist on another plane to the rest of us, don't you??

You keep babbling on about 'Internet wealth' whatever the **** that is. I know what I'm worth and its none of your business, nor anybody else's here. I'm very 'comfortable' thanks.

You believe whatever feeds your simple little mind. Alternatively, get another kitchen - quick! I hear Stan is going for three!....

 

Like I said fella, I don't think anyone's demonstrating that on either side. And with all due respect, you wouldn't be 'liking' posts where someone wasn't capable of adult conversation either, but just because they happened to be on your side. Don't get me wrong I'm as guilty as you, but I don't claim that either side has the moral or factual high ground here.