Hey Tom, this is the second time you've ignored directly asked questions recently. Is this what you do when you don't have an answer?
No that's a small reason. The main reason is that based on what I've researched I don't rate him at all as a manager and I think he'll be ****ing **** in England.
What research Tom? Sounds to me like you looked at some stats made up your mind he was **** and chose to ignore all the positive articles on him that suggest he may be a good fit for us. What was your research on Poch? What was your research on Koeman? You are so petulant.
So Black is Lee's replacement....I liked Lee. Puel must have impressed the board and I'm willing to bet their research is better than any fan on a forum. Of course, anyone can make a mistake, but I prefer to hope they haven't. Our job is just to back the new manager.
I like the sound of Puel personally, the more I have read, the more he seems a good fit for us. But I think it is fair to have reservations about Eric Black coming anywhere near saints. I honestly don't see why that's an embarrassing opinion - let alone to be sworn at. Anyway, its only the Internet and FLT I know you're a positive person but the point of a forum is to discuss things without getting abuse.
But Black isn't the manager....why are people assuming he can't coach or provide assistance to a manager.
I remember hearing that Lee had an offer to go back 'ooop norf' and link up with Rafa Benitez again at Newcastle.
Ossie, you're not being like Tom is, and I apologise if I misinterpreted the above post and it was meant as positive.
If we have a bad season we will lose Ryan, Virgil & Fras. That what scares me. Hope the new gaffer team can impress them pretty quickly, they have to buy into the project. Hopefully our players didn't notice that guy skulking around the technical area at Villa pretending to be in charge!
Indeed. And now at least, we can go back to thinking David Platt was badly fouled and Koeman should have been sent off.
