It may just look like a full stop, but the small dot invites the viewer to bring their own narrative to what appears to be an empty post. It is a post that creates a landscape for the viewer to ponder their own response to the full stop, to question its meaning and to critique their own reaction to it. Does the full stop mean the end ? Or is it just the beginning of the conversation ; coaxing the viewer to bring their own story to the table ? The full stop can be considered as an existential conundrum, to stop or to continue ? To give in to its command or to challenge it with a new narrative. I call this full stop, the dot of inquisition.
I've had two site bans. I've actually not long returned from a 3 month suspension I've been banned from the Newcastle and QPR boards. Both boards have now lifted their suspensions on me Hull City, hate them ****ing inbred ****s. I've got a life ban from them scruffy ****ers. Suits us both just fine. Liverpool, I'm banned from that board. Have been for about 18 months and I honestly have never had any idea, why! Threatened with a one week suspension from the Swansea board, less than one week ago. That makes me look way worse than what I am. I'm one of those people who just keeps happening to be in the wrong place, at the wrong time!
Oh, that's not really fair. Sutcliffe was a psychpathic lunatic. Not all Mackems are psycho loonies....
There's at least a third of the crowd at the SOL that are geordies. Same goes with Newcastle, there's thousands of Mackems that attend SJP every home game. Being a Geordie and a Mackem has nothing to do with football.
