I've done that already haven't I? I would think Bruce will look to bring in a striker for Hernandez to play off, a new left wing, and will play Jake and diame in centre midfield.
What happened to Diame's advanced role?
I've done that already haven't I? I would think Bruce will look to bring in a striker for Hernandez to play off, a new left wing, and will play Jake and diame in centre midfield.
Never heard of a diamond have you? That's the formation we used last time he was up and about in the PL. Bruce joked about him and Sam using diamonds after our match with west ham.What happened to Diame's advanced role?
Never heard of a diamond have you? That's the formation we used last time he was up and about in the PL. Bruce joked about him and Sam using diamonds after our match with west ham.
Never heard of a diamond have you? That's the formation we used last time he was up and about in the PL. Bruce joked about him and Sam using diamonds after our match with west ham.
Jake central, diame advanced, with left and right wingers, not really that unconventional.Yes, but a conventional diamond has an attacking focal point, 2 tucked in wide midfielders and a defensive point. So are you saying Diame at the head of a diamond and Jake at the bottom? That's not centre midfield then. And where's this left winger playing that you're after? Or are you using a really unconventional diamond with wingers and therefore nobody actually in the middle of the pitch?
It's revolutionary I'll give you that.
Jake central, diame advanced, with left and right wingers, not really that unconventional.
We'd get overran with a two man midfield of Livermore and diame , if the diame of the championship season turns up.
Like huddlestone been far too languid and laid back in his performances this season, I think we need two with the same ability on the ball as diame and huddlestone but with a far greater work ethic
If you honestly don't think Bruce will look to buy a proper second striker then you carry on thinking that.
Yes, getting rid of them from the first XI.
And that's why I said Bruce's XI. He wont play with 2 strikers, it'll be Diame behind Hernandez.
So if we discount the 2nd striker I'm guessing you're saying Snodgrass and Huddlestone need replacing more than Mcgregor?
I didnt say he wouldnt buy a second striker though did I?
Here comes the backtrack.Here comes the backtrack.
I said he would look to buy a proper second striker, you said he would play Diame behind Hernandez, and that "he won't play with two strikers".
In the post you quoted saying "Now where did I say that" I said "If you honestly don't think Bruce will look to buy a PROPER second striker"...
He's hardly going to spunk money on a "proper" second striker, and then park that striker on the bench in favour of Diame.
There's absolutely zero backtrack whatsoever. Buying another striker and playing 2 strikers together for the first 10 games from the start of the season are not the same thing. FACT.
Why have you capped and bolded PROPER?
To highlight the word that you seem to have missed. You asked where you said Bruce wouldn't buy a second proper striker, and I showed you where. You're now trying to twist it to mean something else entirely.
Give it up and let it go. We will play with 2 strikers up top whenever possible next season.
No. Im not twisting anything. You're confusing buying and playing.
You havent showed me anything,. I did not say at any stage that Bruce wouldnt buy another striker. FACT.
You said we would play Diame would play behind Hernandez, correct?
I think you're misunderstanding my use of proper then. Proper meaning a striker of first XI calibre.
Yes, that's what I think we'll play. And yes, I did misunderstand that because that's not what PROPER means. Someone should tell Ulloa at Lester that he's not a PROPER striker.