Who ever was wandering around Oxford Circus today in the new City kit, please don't. It's just too embarrassing with that awful cash converters tat plastered on the front!
Check out TWS board, there's a thread on there about how many of each kit some bloke saw while on a weeks holiday at Butlin's in Skegness. I can't believe he posted an article about spending a week at Butlin's, never mind what people were wearing. If you can't be arsed to check, there were three WS and one one City.
**** do you support your club or the sponser.****all wrong with the new kit.you see that tigers crest? fanny.if anyone says it's **** maul them.i feel embarresed cos i'm tarred with ****s like you
TBH my son has just bought one with his birthday money. Her indoors has said he can't wear it on holiday because of the ****e sponsor. I have told her to wind her neck in . He wears it because he supports Hull City ,not the sponsor.He couldn't give a flying **** if it had Harrods or Poundland on the front. My views are mellowing shall we say .
don't you wish you could go back to the days where there were no sponsors? that's the modern game, money talks.. only a couple of seasons ago West brom didn't have a sponsor on their shirts.. my baggies mate said they sold like wildfire.. what does that tell you?
but... I don't agree with the message of this article.. if you decide to buy the shirt you're entitled to wear it when and where you please (and incidentally I once pulled a nice Moroccan lass in the promotion shirt).. I wear my City tops here in Lyon and I wore them in Turkey before.. something Leeds can't do without risk of injury.. best leave that one..
another one who sees cash converters on the strip instead of £££ .it might be small but it's there on the left tit go on have a look.go on i dare you.what do you see?