1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Off Topic that super injunction?

Discussion in 'Hull City' started by PattyNchips2, May 20, 2016.

?

does anyone know who it is?

  1. yup

    50.0%
  2. nah dont care

    50.0%
  1. Chilton's Hundreds

    Chilton's Hundreds Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2012
    Messages:
    5,547
    Likes Received:
    3,171

    Elton John, David Furnish & Happy ?
     
    #21
  2. originallambrettaman

    originallambrettaman Mod Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    111,784
    Likes Received:
    76,413
    All happened in his shed apparently.
     
    #22
    PattyNchips2 likes this.
  3. PattyNchips2

    PattyNchips2 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2012
    Messages:
    18,441
    Likes Received:
    7,126
    it was all Happys idea according to Reg Dwight
     
    #23
  4. Edelman

    Edelman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2014
    Messages:
    19,797
    Likes Received:
    9,105
    Nah hes only got a small one.
     
    #24
  5. Happy Tiger

    Happy Tiger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    15,983
    Likes Received:
    7,363
  6. Ernie Shackleton

    Ernie Shackleton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2013
    Messages:
    13,300
    Likes Received:
    25,344
    None of them involved, Haps.

    This appears to be strictly a Gentleman's arrangement.
     
    #26
    Fez likes this.
  7. BlackAndAmberGambler

    BlackAndAmberGambler Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    9,350
    Likes Received:
    9,607
    Like what you did there Ern. "Strictly". Arf.
     
    #27
  8. RicardoHCAFC

    RicardoHCAFC Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    10,311
    Likes Received:
    454
    One of the papers in their public effort to put pressure on the courts to drop the ban produced an editorial claiming it was stupid to stop them reporting it because everyone who was interested already knew who it was. The only challenge they can make to the ban is that it is in the public interest to allow them to report it, and that requires them to be telling us about something we don't already know.
     
    #28

Share This Page